I think Spence would beat him but by the time it's economically convent for those two to meet Spence might not be able to make 147 anymore.
He beats everyone else tho IMO.
Brook, Porter, Thurman, Garcia, Spence... ect.
It's gonna be exciting!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Spence would beat him but by the time it's economically convent for those two to meet Spence might not be able to make 147 anymore.
He beats everyone else tho IMO.
Can't see Crawford being in the top 3
It's not Crawford's fault but the guys he's beaten aren't great
None have a been the man in their division or have a long history as a reigning champ
Indongo fights like an waving inflatable arm tube man and him having 2 belts is indicative of how weak 140 is
Because Vasyl deserves it. He's the most technically gifted boxer in this current generation. The Rembrandt of fighting. His footwork is a joy to watch. Lomachenko is so good at offering a vast array of mixed offense and defense. He's dismantling opponents with ease. I give him favored status in a potential bout with Rigo. Would also like to see "Hi-Tech" avenge his lone pro loss to Salido. Dirty fight and seemingly intentional low blows.Atlas still got Loma #1 P4P on his list
Because Vasyl deserves it. He's the most technically gifted boxer in this current generation. The Rembrandt of fighting. His footwork is a joy to watch. Lomachenko is so good at offering a vast array of mixed offense and defense. He's dismantling opponents with ease. I give him favored status in a potential bout with Rigo. Would also like to see "Hi-Tech" avenge his lone pro loss to Salido. Dirty fight and seemingly intentional low blows.
Spence can beat GGG?
I thought it was ridiculous at first. But after thinking about it for a while the gap between them is not that wide. I don't think Spence can beat him right now but in the near future it is very feasible.The things said in this thread amaze me sometime.
Come on...Crawford vs Mikey @ 140.... who y'all putting money on?
Come on...
I said it after the postol fight last year that it's hard for me to see Bud ever losing a pro fight even at 147 and I still feel the same way. I don't remember the last time he's even lost a round in a fight. I'd favor him vs anyone. Dude is special.
I'm not sure where I'd put him but Thurman feels very underrated at times.
I got Crawford winning.... but I'd put money on Mikey. (Depending on the over/under ofcourse)
But I'm sure Mikey would be a big underdog so I'd put money on him.
I said it after the postol fight last year that it's hard for me to see Bud ever losing a pro fight even at 147 and I still feel the same way. I don't remember the last time he's even lost a round in a fight. I'd favor him vs anyone. Dude is special.
It's not meant to sound lovely, simply making the case in defense of Atlas's P4P ranking. I disagree that discussing Vasyl as potential #1 is premature at all. We're talking about an Olympic gold medalist with perhaps the most decorated amateur boxing career in history. 396-1, with his lone loss twice avenged as most know. More importantly, dissecting Lomachenko's tape shows a work of art. He's so technically sound, it's incredible. The footwork, fight IQ and overall ring generalship. Another reason it's not premature, Vasyl is constantly and actively accelerating his career by asking for tough fights and the best competition around. He was practically begging Walters to sign the bout. Now it's on to Rigo.All of that sounds lovely, really, but it's still premature and "deserves it" if we're being real is a major stretch.
With that said, I'll be at MSG on 12/2 if that really goes down and THAT is the kind of fight that puts him closer to the top of the P4P list.
Walters fight probably put him in my Top5 because I do also appreciate how talented he is.