- Mar 24, 2001
- 44,833
- 66,536
For who?
I know Miami wants him bad.
Gallo Adams and whatever picks they want. They could even absorb Wall's contract. I don't think any other team could offer all that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For who?
I know Miami wants him bad.
I wish Milwaukee could deal for Beal
It always depends landscape too. With GSW out of the fold, teams knew they had to seize the moment. With LAL, especially with Lebby's age/window
The OKC/LAC trade should be viewed through the prism of LAC trading all those picks for George and Leonard. If George isn't there neither is Leonard
There would be no Leonard without George, and the sequence was pretty straight forward but okI'm never gonna see it like that . It was literally a Paul George trade
Their ownership should be ashamed. If I lived in that city and supported them through the years I'd be heatedMilwaukee just letting Brogdon go is probably one of the worst moves of the summer. At the very least he would have been a great asset.
There would be no Leonard without George, and the sequence was pretty straight forward but ok
The whole reason OKC extracted what they did was because they knew LAC needed George to land Leonard. That was the driving force behind the fundamentals of that tradeThey didn't get Kawhi from OKC is my point tho
The whole reason OKC extracted what they did was because they knew LAC needed George to land Leonard. That was the driving force behind the fundamentals of that trade
If Leonard wasn't coming you really think LAC would have done that same deal for George?
The whole reason OKC extracted what they did was because they knew LAC needed George to land Leonard. That was the driving force behind the fundamentals of that trade
If Leonard wasn't coming you really think LAC would have done that same deal for George?
Lebby's window= closing quick, they needed to do whatever it took to maximize that short windowPeep my edit. And yes why wouldn't they have done the same deal? What would their alternative be? You kinda contradicted yourself because the Lakers already had Bron and still have up what they did for Davis. Basically what I'm saying is that it's gonna take more than a package centered around Malik Beasley to get Bradley Beal
Lebby's window= closing quick, they needed to do whatever it took to maximize that short window
There didn't need to be an alternative if LAC couldn't land Leonard. Jerry is smarter than that, you know this by now
Malik Beasley and Gary Harris is pretty good starting point but what other packages are out there?
Bledsoe shooting in the 20s from downtown, scored single digits in literally half the games after the 1st round and that’s the guy they want to next to Giannis.Milwaukee just letting Brogdon go is probably one of the worst moves of the summer. At the very least he would have been a great asset.
Jerry is smart enough to not do that same trade if Leonard was not coming. Don't know how that isn't obvious but alrightLac didn't have an alternative because they couldn't get any other free agent despite having two max slots. Doesn't matter how smart Jerry is in that case. Beasley is a bench player bro . OKC can offer expirings, cap relief and a ton of picks. Washington could do a lot with that