- 2,259
- 14,850
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
I already own the erosion 95s but when in comes to the AMMs
OFFICIAL 2020 - 2021 AIR MAX 95 THREAD
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by gswarriorz,
- Start date
- 727
- 3,280
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2020
Whew. Easy pass on this one. Hope those that want em get theirs easy.
- 7,407
- 10,111
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Thank God it wasn’t those leather church shoes because those were awful…..
I AM IN!!
- 37,194
- 31,781
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
Give me my erosions.
- 16,133
- 22,832
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- 7,697
- 32,478
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
If it’s anything like the 3s and 4s they’ll be giving them away
- 20,007
- 36,307
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- 39,227
- 78,832
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
Central Cee x Nike Air Max 95
Thursday, 10/24
- 9,804
- 34,121
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
Central Cee's are dope!!!! 
I don't know anything about the young fella other than he's a musician, but those are nice.
Central Cee 95's > AMM 95's.
I don't know anything about the young fella other than he's a musician, but those are nice.
Central Cee 95's > AMM 95's.
- 9,804
- 34,121
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
- 37,194
- 31,781
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
May have to grab these.
Central Cee x Nike Air Max 95
Thursday, 10/24
- 7,407
- 10,111
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
I just don’t see it? Figured the pair we saw previously was an F&F pair compared to the pair releasing.
- 9,804
- 34,121
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
Post up 2 comparative pictures. We may be talking about 2 different things as well.
- 7,407
- 10,111
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Got’chu
Only difference I see is the above version is a lot more brighter colors even with the light but I still could be wrong and also noticing the perforations on the toebox too?
Now the pair that is releasing looks more muted in color but again I could be wrong with the lighting they chose to shoot for the 95’s.
Maybe you might see somethin I am not seeing.
- 4,983
- 2,904
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2014
Def just the lighting or edit. One pic is clearly warmer than the other but they are def the same shoes.
- 7,882
- 9,798
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Yep and the perforations appear on both pairs. Just warm lighting vs very cool lighting. White balance is waaaaay different between the two sets of pics.
- 9,804
- 34,121
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2003
Yes to what the others have just said.
Same shoe, just different lighting, etc.
We will indeed be getting the leather church shoes.
- 7,407
- 10,111
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Lmao I guess so! AMA got there own deceiving filters like Kith I guess.Yes to what the others have just said.
Same shoe, just different lighting, etc.
We will indeed be getting the leather church shoes.
darthska
Staff member
- 46,490
- 30,771
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
To be clear, you all are saying these are the same shoe, just different lighting?
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
- 10,823
- 20,027
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
Meanwhile…This is the pair they should be dropping 
- 2,660
- 5,422
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
Too much AMM branding on those, IMO. Tongue, heel, and toe? Think I'm out.
- 7,407
- 10,111
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
Yes lol because the photos are edited. I think this photo should help……maybe I should of used this one instead?To be clear, you all are saying these are the same shoe, just different lighting?
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
- 19,216
- 19,890
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2013
I’m having flashbacks from my younger years
Is it a blue and black dress or a white and gold dress?
Is it a blue and black dress or a white and gold dress?
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 19,885
- 39,551
- Joined
- May 23, 2016
Literally same shoe, different lighting
darthska
Staff member
- 46,490
- 30,771
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Both of those pictures look like an earth-toned, brown/tan based colorway. I'm not seeing any of the bluish-gray colorway that has me confuzzled.Literally same shoe, different lighting
