- Mar 30, 2013
- 2,263
- 14,889
I already own the erosion 95s but when in comes to the AMMs
OFFICIAL 2020 - 2021 AIR MAX 95 THREAD
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by gswarriorz,
- Start date
- Nov 17, 2020
- 778
- 3,492
Whew. Easy pass on this one. Hope those that want em get theirs easy.
- Nov 16, 2014
- 7,466
- 10,336
Thank God it wasn’t those leather church shoes because those were awful…..
I AM IN!!
- Jul 22, 2012
- 37,353
- 32,252
Give me my erosions.
- May 20, 2013
- 16,157
- 22,929
- Nov 26, 2014
- 7,780
- 33,191
If it’s anything like the 3s and 4s they’ll be giving them away
- Aug 10, 2012
- 20,424
- 36,771
- Apr 5, 2008
- 39,589
- 80,191
Central Cee x Nike Air Max 95
Thursday, 10/24
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,925
- 34,554
Central Cee's are dope!!!! 
I don't know anything about the young fella other than he's a musician, but those are nice.
Central Cee 95's > AMM 95's.
I don't know anything about the young fella other than he's a musician, but those are nice.
Central Cee 95's > AMM 95's.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,925
- 34,554
- Jul 22, 2012
- 37,353
- 32,252
May have to grab these.
Central Cee x Nike Air Max 95
Thursday, 10/24
- Nov 16, 2014
- 7,466
- 10,336
I just don’t see it? Figured the pair we saw previously was an F&F pair compared to the pair releasing.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,925
- 34,554
Post up 2 comparative pictures. We may be talking about 2 different things as well.
- Nov 16, 2014
- 7,466
- 10,336
Got’chu
Only difference I see is the above version is a lot more brighter colors even with the light but I still could be wrong and also noticing the perforations on the toebox too?
Now the pair that is releasing looks more muted in color but again I could be wrong with the lighting they chose to shoot for the 95’s.
Maybe you might see somethin I am not seeing.
- Jun 21, 2014
- 5,010
- 2,943
Def just the lighting or edit. One pic is clearly warmer than the other but they are def the same shoes.
- Apr 30, 2011
- 8,233
- 10,914
Yep and the perforations appear on both pairs. Just warm lighting vs very cool lighting. White balance is waaaaay different between the two sets of pics.
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,925
- 34,554
Yes to what the others have just said.
Same shoe, just different lighting, etc.
We will indeed be getting the leather church shoes.
- Nov 16, 2014
- 7,466
- 10,336
Lmao I guess so! AMA got there own deceiving filters like Kith I guess.Yes to what the others have just said.
Same shoe, just different lighting, etc.
We will indeed be getting the leather church shoes.
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,084
- 31,793
To be clear, you all are saying these are the same shoe, just different lighting?
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
- May 7, 2002
- 10,864
- 20,211
Meanwhile…This is the pair they should be dropping 
- Feb 1, 2019
- 2,713
- 5,564
Too much AMM branding on those, IMO. Tongue, heel, and toe? Think I'm out.
- Nov 16, 2014
- 7,466
- 10,336
Yes lol because the photos are edited. I think this photo should help……maybe I should of used this one instead?To be clear, you all are saying these are the same shoe, just different lighting?
Just making sure, because EYE am confuzzled.
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,297
- 20,149
I’m having flashbacks from my younger years
Is it a blue and black dress or a white and gold dress?
Is it a blue and black dress or a white and gold dress?
dblplay1212
Supporter
- May 23, 2016
- 20,251
- 40,249
Literally same shoe, different lighting
darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 47,084
- 31,793
Both of those pictures look like an earth-toned, brown/tan based colorway. I'm not seeing any of the bluish-gray colorway that has me confuzzled.Literally same shoe, different lighting
