RustyShackleford
is immune to any factual information regaurding Pelosi and Schumers lack of damns about the American people. Its only Mitch McConnell, no one else playing politcs with peoples livelihoods.
Oh please, you want to ignore observable reality you force some both sides ******** again.
Pelosi and Schumer are the problems? Really?
-They want a 3.2 Trillion dollar Stimulus that had checks and an extension. Money to help state governments and no liability shield. A plan most economists worth a damn supported. Trump and Mitch said no. Trump wanted around 1.2 trillion
-They said ok, compromise, let us meet in the middle. Came down a trillion. Still no.
-They were negotiating, then Mitch told Trump to walk away from the table, he did. Then passed some stupid memos and executive order
-Weeks later they come back to the table, they are negotiating down to the wire, Mitch was saying the Senate would not agree to such a large a bill. It seems like he was never on board with whatever Mnuchin and Pelosi were working out. He was the one saying welp we would have to wait until the lame-duck session.
-Lame-duck session, he still not supporting any bill besides the skinny one he proposed
-Just recently a bipartisan group put together a weak sauce compromise deal. The Dems said they would support the bill as a jumping-off point for negotiations. Agreeing to the size and scope deal could have been based on that. Mitch McConnell said no to this outright.
https://www.adn.com/nation-world/20...n-senate-for-bipartisan-pandemic-aid-package/
The part you are ignoring is that Mitch McConnell never backed any of Trump's higher proposals. When Mnuchin was trying to cut a deal, they only brought a skinny bill to the Senate. Not a 1.2 trillion plan, not a 1.7 trillion-dollar one.
The Dems are generally united in the negotiating position, the GOP isn't, that is the core negotiating issue. Trump can't control McConnell. That is why I am putting so much blame on Mitch, even above Trump. Because Mitch himself showed no interest to compromise, or even passing what was Mnuchin supposedly offering.
Plus the flip side of your argument exists too. If providing economic help to the economy were so tied to Trump's electoral chances, then it is on him that he didn't accept the massive bailout the Dems were proposing. How in the hell was Pelosi trying to sabotage the man, when her plan was the most robust and provided the most help. He could have easily agreed to it, and own it as his own politically, and improve his electoral chances. The smart politics was to take the Dems deal if we are gonna talking about Trump's electoral chances. But because Pelosi didn't just roll over to Trump completely, she is against helping people?
Your only criticism of them seems to be they didn't give in to the GOP's ******* for short-changing people along the way, so they are equally to blame for people get help. That they didn't abandon all the other stuff and agree to skinny bills with no guarantee that the negotiations about the other stuff would continue. How about the damn GOP unify around a position and negotiate in good faith.
So please, spare me the false equivalency