- Aug 24, 2014
- 16
- 10
still have size 10? can pm the link? thanks a lot
Official Jordan 1.5
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by iriesupreme,
- Start date
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,756
- 47,964
WOW crazy wonder why its not showing up on his page?
- Apr 30, 2001
- 1,906
- 1,101
Need a 12. Could one of you kindly pm me the link? Thank you. Gracias obrigado
- Dec 19, 2013
- 130
- 36
price has gone back to $142 now,,,but possible drop again in the next wk or 2
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
His prices always fluctuate
- Jul 27, 2015
- 309
- 118
you have to check every couple days. Been buying from this seller for awhile can't beat his sales
- Apr 2, 2014
- 11,812
- 26,063
Can anyone else confirm the quality on the Soar Blues is inferior to the Chi 1.5s? I saw one dude earlier say they were night & day, so I'm tempted to hold off til the Royals & Breds drop if that's the case.
- Aug 5, 2015
- 159
- 69
Got my pair in from kicksftw. Best $72 I ever spent on Js. Quality is much better than I thought but if you're expecting UNC 1 quality you'd be dissapointed. Leather around the toe-box is very nice, everything else is just okay. These look really good, pics don't do them justice.
- Apr 25, 2015
- 568
- 194
Repped
- Jan 17, 2015
- 355
- 102
IDK if this pic has been posted already but here's Jordan wearing the 1.5s
- Jun 4, 2015
- 2,259
- 1,240
Mj wearing them.......oh snap, i neeeeed to cop multiples now!
- Dec 19, 2006
- 21,730
- 7,668
yes it was posted since the beginning
- Oct 18, 2015
- 15
- 10
Most peeps don't like how the Jordan 1.5 looks but man their more comfortable than the 1s
- Mar 24, 2014
- 2,924
- 914
Looks like I missed out on the $72 deal ... 
- Dec 19, 2013
- 130
- 36
I have also just received my $72 solar 1.5 today and below are my thoughts so far comparing with my CHI 1.5.
- I have found some areas on Solar 1.5 that are better material used and some not.
-Both toe box are nice and soft however, I found the upper part leather(red) on CHI has softer leather vs. solar blue(black) This part on solar blue feels harder.
-Mid section white leather on Solar blue are used with a little better leather with more details. CHI's white leather on this particular section is plan and flat.
-The black swish on solar blue is also better quality than the CHI
Conclusion: Both pairs are nice with good materials used on different part of shoes. Very comfortable all day shoes and most importantly you can score them now for way under retails.
- I have found some areas on Solar 1.5 that are better material used and some not.
-Both toe box are nice and soft however, I found the upper part leather(red) on CHI has softer leather vs. solar blue(black) This part on solar blue feels harder.
-Mid section white leather on Solar blue are used with a little better leather with more details. CHI's white leather on this particular section is plan and flat.
-The black swish on solar blue is also better quality than the CHI
Conclusion: Both pairs are nice with good materials used on different part of shoes. Very comfortable all day shoes and most importantly you can score them now for way under retails.
- Apr 2, 2014
- 11,812
- 26,063
^^^Repped. Thanks for the comparison!
- Nov 9, 2011
- 3,163
- 638
You are the man
solelovejs96
! Been waiting for a good, detailed side by side! Repped ya
solelovejs96
! Been waiting for a good, detailed side by side! Repped ya
- Dec 19, 2013
- 130
- 36
I am happy if my 2cents helps some of ya on making decision easier.
Looking forward to see if 1.5 come out with any other CW such as Bred.
Looking forward to see if 1.5 come out with any other CW such as Bred.
- Apr 2, 2014
- 11,812
- 26,063
Breds are supposed to land around Thanksgiving, aren't they?
- Jan 22, 2014
- 497
- 214
Anybody have pictures of toe box creasing? I'm interested in buying the soar pair but not if it creases like my 2013 chicagos....
- Nov 9, 2011
- 3,163
- 638
IMO the chi 1.5s are a lot better than the'13 chicagos. Not building them up but those 2013s were horrible. Just a straight up disgrace, I never owned the '13s so I don't have any personal experience on them but the 1.5s have held up nicely after a handful of wears.
- Dec 10, 2014
- 129
- 34
- Jan 22, 2014
- 497
- 214
- Dec 19, 2013
- 130
- 36
I can second that, I had the 2013 Chicago and everything about that shoes felt horrible. Cheap material used and very uncomfortable.
- Jun 4, 2015
- 2,259
- 1,240
I wonder why folks bought the 2013s at all if they were that awful.....i mean didnt anyone notice the quality before they handed money over?
