Definately was.^Yea Portland is quickstrike Rsvp
That's crazy. Did they have only a one size run?lolOpened
Closed
and sent DMs in about 45 seconds.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definately was.^Yea Portland is quickstrike Rsvp
That's crazy. Did they have only a one size run?lolOpened
Closed
and sent DMs in about 45 seconds.
if were talking only about the silhouettes, than how come you consider the 10s to be ok? theyre basically the same shape as the 8s. not disagreeing with your point or attacking you, I just want to hear your elaboration on it..since you usually break **** down good
Ok cool, let me 1st state this is purely my opinion as an active basketball playing 26 year old male that does occasionally wear basketball shoes casually. The 8 and 10 are damn near identical technically when we speak of silhouette, just the outer figure of the shoe if it was a shadow, true. Now my issue with the 10 in comparison to the 8 is model design. 1st problem, the 10 is not a smoothly put together design. From that cut out diamond at the toe box that awkwardly protrudes to the oddly placed ventilation patterns that are scattered across the upper to the weirdly deep cut into the back of the ankle support, it's just an awkward design. The 8's were the single best casual design in the Lebron line. It's was a clean and simplistic design that flowed and had a symmetrical balance that's absent from the 10. Like many have stated previously, the 10 looks like a V4 of the 8 or a scrapped 8 design that was unfortunately resurrected. The 10 looks like they took a step backwards from the 9 in the LBJ line continuation. Performance wise I don't really have any complaints but since most seem to be wearing these casually and prefer a visual appeal the 10 seriously lacks that presence. For example I can rock the Blackout 8 with just about anything in my casual wardrobe and look clean and finished while on the other hand those Carbon 10's I wouldn't buy at $29.99 Outlet prices to ever wear casually. I won't get into the material of that butter soft leather that was used on the 8 V1 either. The 10 is a 100% performance shoe that should not see a casual wear in its life cycle, from material to design down to technology these should stay on basketball courts. Once again it's just my opinion that was asked for so here is my reply. This particular model simply doesn't have that visual aesthetic that deems it casually acceptable to my style's eye. Sorry that was so long. Feel free to shed light on a different perspective if you disagree, I always enjoy another opinion when shared respectfully in an adult manner without argument.
thats exactly how i felt about the IXs tho
is portlands rsvp even legit?
LOL...yeah, I understand 2mins, but seconds...C'Mon now!!!is portlands rsvp even legit?
Get the style number & color code and then call a nike store and ask them to do a nikefind for you. that's where all of nike's inventory data is pooled and it'll tell you what stores have em if anyI called both of my local stores, one didn't even act like they knew what a stock locate was and the other told me that the Christmas was a HOH only and that they couldn't order it from another store. Gotta love those local retail employees. All this because Eastbay sent me an 11.5 when i needed a 12. With the insoles out my toes were still a little too cramped for my liking so i ultimately decided to send them back. Guess i'm just gonna have to keep checking ole fleabay.
Lets hope the lebron 10 is like the Jordan's. 9s were dope, 10s were decent, but 11 go hard.
Ok cool, let me 1st state this is purely my opinion as an active basketball playing 26 year old male that does occasionally wear basketball shoes casually. The 8 and 10 are damn near identical technically when we speak of silhouette, just the outer figure of the shoe if it was a shadow, true. Now my issue with the 10 in comparison to the 8 is model design. 1st problem, the 10 is not a smoothly put together design. From that cut out diamond at the toe box that awkwardly protrudes to the oddly placed ventilation patterns that are scattered across the upper to the weirdly deep cut into the back of the ankle support, it's just an awkward design. The 8's were the single best casual design in the Lebron line. It's was a clean and simplistic design that flowed and had a symmetrical balance that's absent from the 10. Like many have stated previously, the 10 looks like a V4 of the 8 or a scrapped 8 design that was unfortunately resurrected. The 10 looks like they took a step backwards from the 9 in the LBJ line continuation. Performance wise I don't really have any complaints but since most seem to be wearing these casually and prefer a visual appeal the 10 seriously lacks that presence. For example I can rock the Blackout 8 with just about anything in my casual wardrobe and look clean and finished while on the other hand those Carbon 10's I wouldn't buy at $29.99 Outlet prices to ever wear casually. I won't get into the material of that butter soft leather that was used on the 8 V1 either. The 10 is a 100% performance shoe that should not see a casual wear in its life cycle, from material to design down to technology these should stay on basketball courts. Once again it's just my opinion that was asked for so here is my reply. This particular model simply doesn't have that visual aesthetic that deems it casually acceptable to my style's eye. Sorry that was so long. Feel free to shed light on a different perspective if you disagree, I always enjoy another opinion when shared respectfully in an adult manner without argument.
Lets hope the lebron 10 is like the Jordan's. 9s were dope, 10s were decent, but 11 go hard.
This is my next X, **** everything else.
This is my next X, **** everything else.