lawdog1
Supporter
- 59,978
- 72,320
Doc Rivers I swear to god
Much as I'd like to blame Doc, something is telling me that Ballmer might be behind this. Too rash and extreme of a move for Doc to be acting on his own.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doc Rivers I swear to god
But Balmer loves Blake.Much as I'd like to blame Doc, something is telling me that Ballmer might be behind this. Too rash and extreme of a move for Doc to be acting on his own.
Let me just get this out of the way.
The Clippers have issues. But every team not named the Warriors have issues. Only one team can win a ring.
Currently, we are set to face a historically great team in the 2nd round without homecourt. That's not an excuse, that is what it is. There are no trades or moves that can alleviate that formality.
Now do I think the Clippers can beat the spurs and GSW in a playoff series w/o homecourt? Yes. It's unlikely, and I wouldn't put money on the clippers, but I definitely give them a shot. They are very good against the elite and despite their flameouts in the postseason, they have beaten the warriors, they have beaten the spurs, they should of beaten OKC, they are right there and you never know what could happen come april and may.
But even if we flame out again, trading blake or Chris Paul, while they are both under contract, is NOT the answer. Like I said, there's nothing out there that could make you more viable of a contender than what you have now. Keep working on trying to hit on some buy low guys and roll the dice again. You may as well keep the 26 year old superstar and CP is still a top pg in the league. As long as you have blake cp reddick and jordan you have a shot. As good of shot as any.
Trading Blake or CP is NOT the answer IMO
Take it a step further,Fully agree with all of this. There is no point in breaking up the core in the middle of this season because it will not put us any closer to true championship contention. To do so would scream of panic and overreaction.
But Balmer is an emotional guy who doesn't exactly have a stellar track record for business decisions and GM Doc is . . . GM Doc. So, anything is possible around here, I'm afraid.
Let me just get this out of the way.
The Clippers have issues. But every team not named the Warriors have issues. Only one team can win a ring.
Currently, we are set to face a historically great team in the 2nd round without homecourt. That's not an excuse, that is what it is. There are no trades or moves that can alleviate that formality.
Now do I think the Clippers can beat the spurs and GSW in a playoff series w/o homecourt? Yes. It's unlikely, and I wouldn't put money on the clippers, but I definitely give them a shot. They are very good against the elite and despite their flameouts in the postseason, they have beaten the warriors, they have beaten the spurs, they should of beaten OKC, they are right there and you never know what could happen come april and may.
But even if we flame out again, trading blake or Chris Paul, while they are both under contract, is NOT the answer. Like I said, there's nothing out there that could make you more viable of a contender than what you have now. Keep working on trying to hit on some buy low guys and roll the dice again. You may as well keep the 26 year old superstar and CP is still a top pg in the league. As long as you have blake cp reddick and jordan you have a shot. As good of shot as any.
Trading Blake or CP is NOT the answer IMO
More PT for prigs.
The 2nd unit bout to be booming
How did Austin break his hand? Punching one of the junior dance kids in the face?More Lance too. I can live with that.More PT for prigs.
The 2nd unit bout to be booming
Not gonna judge this team until Blake is back. These wins are nice but they mean nothing jn regards to how we will play with Blake in the offense.
Not gonna judge this team until Blake is back. These wins are nice but they mean nothing jn regards to how we will play with Blake in the offense.
Agree, but some credit has to be given for what the team is doing without him. I was chalking it up to an easy schedule, but these road wins are more than that .
18 of 22, and 2 of those losses were to Minnesota and Sacramento.quietly 18 of the last 22. always said we'd get it together by xmas/the first of the year.
at this point, i think we are maybe 1 of 3 teams that can beat gsw in a playoff series along w/ okc and sas