Well saidI seriously never understood why famous people or pro athletes who legitimately have money opt to wear piece ofswingman apparel. But regular people who aren't rich like a lot of us on here maintain standards and abstain from putting that
I will always see that opting to wear swingman apparel as a failure, loss and F up in life until I die.
I'm so tired of the pathetic and played out narrative of swingman crap being an affordable option. It's just a sorry justification to possess something inferior as a substitute for someone who cannot afford a better quality product. If you cannot afford a better quality product, then you shouldn't opt to go with an inferior option just to try to fit in.
It doesn't mean you should go with something inferior or unacceptable just because it's available as an option. Not all options are necessarily good or acceptable.
Since there was discussion about trying to return a product that became flawed after wearing, it's doubtful any company would accept a return on it because most of them state that worn or washed items aren't acceptable for return with their policy. Most of them accept flawed or damaged items for return only if you received or purchased it in that condition.
therealest1
.Thanks for elaborating that the Swingman line is inferior and complete garbage. The only Swingman Collection I acknowledge is the Nike Swingmans in the early 2000’s.
Current swingmans have heat pressed patches that can’t handle a gentle cycle in the wash. The swingman shorts are a whole another story as they lack the triangle on the bottom of the shorts. A true disgrace to the design and team.
People who buy Swingmans are actually wasting money since the product is low quality rubbish that won’t last long. I’d rather save a little more money and purchase the better quality product that will last the test of time. Authentics are heavyweight and will withstand many loads.
Last edited:
@ calling out trash being elitist. 
