- 2,692
- 5,651
Article is more about Goodell than anything. Basically saying he looked the other way with all the allegations...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course that's your favorite part, you are literally the NT version of Mark Brunell my man.My favorite part is the fact that people keep defending the Patriots.
I wish the Skins cheated. Would probably still backfire on them
I just want to know how far he was going with this betting against romo thing
last time he tried to bet me, he would only do it if shoes was the holder of the money, get the F outta here
I just want to know how far he was going with this betting against romo thing
last time he tried to bet me, he would only do it if shoes was the holder of the money, get the F outta here
What? Shoes seemed like the man for the job considering he's always been a fair, stand-up individual in my eyes.
how far should one not be willing to bet against romo?
doesn't answer the question..I mean.... my team's better than yours, my quarterbacks better than yours. So perhaps we can bet who will have a better record, Eagles or Redskids?
how far should one not be willing to bet against romo?
View media item 230751
What? Shoes seemed like the man for the job considering he's always been a fair, stand-up individual in my eyes.
I have no problem providing you to a shot to lose your paper again though, same bookie/ $ holder doe, lmk.
Check the 2006 dust up over Jason Taylor/Zach Thomas, and the Pats. We "stole" their signal calls, and blanked them 20-0. Brady and the Pats waved us off like it was nothin, and they're probably right.
Do y'all not realize that Roger looks just as bad, if not worse, in all of this?
What? Shoes seemed like the man for the job considering he's always been a fair, stand-up individual in my eyes.