- 783
- 10
If you thinking about keeping the 24-70L just for studio - don't! If you have space and lights the 70-200L is more than enough and actuallywhat a lot of people shoot with .. the brick ehhhh .. get rid of it and like that you can get the 35L with that money ...Originally Posted by Rap Sizzle
The 2 zooms that I have are the 24-70L and 70-200 2.8 IS. I wanted to stick with primes but I needed the 70-200 for sports. The 24-70L I'm about to put up for sale but I'm slightly reluctant since it would be very useful for studio, which I'm slowly getting in to. Right now I'm thinking about trading in my 50L for a 35L. I'd like to keep the 50 but my funds won't allow it, especially with the splurging I just did
Oh and going back to the whole Nikon vs Canon lenses, I was really close to making the switch to Nikon when I got annoyed with my 5D2's auto-focus. The D700 on the other hand is fitted with AF system similar to the pro bodies. I was about to make the jump when I realized that Canon primes trumps Nikon's.
Also, is there any reason why will you want to get rid of the 50L for a 35L? Just curious ... I have the 35L and it has seen a lot of bag since Im in thestudio most of the time ..