- 1,030
- 1,191
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2019
If it gets down to $400ish i’m paying
Really? I couldn't do it for a cheap *** preme tee. Some of their stuff is nice. The tees are awful quality imo.doubt it ever will but I’m in the same boat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If it gets down to $400ish i’m paying
Really? I couldn't do it for a cheap *** preme tee. Some of their stuff is nice. The tees are awful quality imo.doubt it ever will but I’m in the same boat.
i dont believe that, its something
theres billionaires and brands that donated nothing
People paying resell is only adding to the problem.
If we're in a recession, it's actually a good thing to have more money moving here
haha yea cause $600 supreme t shirts will help “boost” the economy -__-
It depends, of course, on what you value. I'm sure there are people who see today's box logos as a success. I think the Doernbecher collections come much closer to matching supply with demand, though, of course, there are exceptions. Also, Nike supports the hospital in many other ways throughout the year, most recently with cash and PPE donations--in addition to promoting donations to the hospital through its employee giving and otherwise. With that said, I am a lifelong Nike fan and a longtime shareholder, but I have my fair share of criticism for them, too.Nah, Nike releases very limited Doernbecher releases every year and people don't bat an eye. In fact, those releases actually help the brand because they bring both hype and positive attention to the brand, even though they definitely could be doing more financially if they sold more of those releases.
No but, and this is a VERY simplified way of looking at it, whomever gets that $600 likely spends it on an activity to keep another person or persons employed. If that $600 was sitting in a checking account, for example, it wouldn't be as beneficial to the macro economy of the country.
mass producing 1 t-shirt in their 25+ year history is not going to hurt their brand.
Na.Perception is everything though. If everyone has the same BOLO, people would start saying it is "played out." Supreme lives/dies based on consumer perception and hype. Their brand was built on people lining up for limited drops.
its's 1 tee, for charity at that. sure if you've only been buying supreme for 2 years and all you care about is scarcity then sure it hurts the brand for you, but those people don't matter because they're trend hopping every couple years.Perception is everything though. If everyone has the same BOLO, people would start saying it is "played out." Supreme lives/dies based on consumer perception and hype. Their brand was built on people lining up for limited drops.
Retail, generally, employs a huge number of people and they are getting hit quite hard right now. I've definitely made some conscious decisions about where to buy from that aren't Amazon, etc, even if it's just gift cards that I may never be able to use.i get what you’re saying... still a huge reach.
its's 1 tee, for charity at that. sure if you've only been buying supreme for 2 years and all you care about is scarcity then sure it hurts the brand for you, but those people don't matter because they're trend hopping every couple years.
in the grand scheme of things I'm perfectly fine seeing everyone with this box logo if it means a ton more money is raised for a good cause. I wouldn't be mad if I saw it at every sneaker release like we see those damn kaws Uniqlo tees.
people calling it bolo, bogo, mogo, preme hurt the brand more than 1 mass produced tee