S3NTINEL2001
formerly the maverick 41
- 2,057
- 395
Originally Posted by sugaray
These joints are weak! They already came out! I'll pass
they never came out, the low tops dont count !!!!!!!!!!!!!
i will cop
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by sugaray
These joints are weak! They already came out! I'll pass
oh naw, if your just talkin about the two upcoming releases then it's CLOSE alright but as for the whole LINE, BARKLEY of course..but both areOriginally Posted by Classy Freshman
Barkleys>Griffeys and it's not even close IMO
Originally Posted by SylvesterMcGrizzly
Wow some dudes are wildin sayin these are ugly, weak, played out...can't be seriousyes nike ran the model into the ground wit the cw's but they have never been or will be a wack shoe...two pair for me...please....thank....you
i had the all white joints..if these drop for under 140 then ill consider copping. but for some reason i always liked the purple colorwayOriginally Posted by Micah18
These released a few years back, and sold with the quickness of the royal foams, the next pair was the white navy's and the all black followed those, all did very well, those greys did come out in gs sizes like 2 years ago, these shoes are very comfy, and better than the griffeys, I want them to be limited cause I don't want them to be whored out by u guys little cousins who still rock jerseys and slouch socks, but yeah they 120, and come out in june
Originally Posted by CharmCityKid
not to feed into the barkley vs. griff dbate, but if i had to choose it'd be griffeys ALL DAY, no question. especially considering the barkleys have already been retrod once. (the lows don't count)