- 12,209
- 277
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2008
Originally Posted by igotthatfire247
... annnnnnd ... fired.
http://backporch.fanhouse...-haiti-remark/?icid=main|main|dl3ink7|http%3A%2F%2Fbackporch.fanhouse.com%2F2010%2F01%2F27%2Fespn-cuts-ties-with-paul-shirley-over-controversial-haiti-remark%2F
Paul Shirley,
the globe-trotting journeyman basketball player, has attracted much
attention over the years for his considerable writing skills. Not all
attention is good attention, of course.
On Tuesday, Shirley wrote a blog post for FlipCollective in which he
suggested that donating money to Haitian relief efforts was not a good idea.
In his post, he also implied that victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean
tsunami and Hurricane Katrina were at least partially to blame for
their situations.
Shirley anticipated that his comments would be controversial, openly
questioning whether he was a "monster" for expressing the opinion he
expressed. I don't know if his opinion makes him a monster, but one
thing is for sure: It just made him a former contributor to ESPN.com.
In a statement released this morning
(reproduced here in its entirety), ESPN said of Shirley, "He was a
part-time freelance contributor. The views he expressed on another's
site of course do not at all reflect our company's views on the Haiti
relief efforts. He will no longer contribute to ESPN."
Paul Shirley is, of course, free to hold and express any opinion he
wishes without fear of governmental retribution. The Constitution
guarantees him that right. Freedom of speech does not exempt him (or
anyone else) from being criticized for any and all opinions he may
express. ESPN was well within its rights to disassociate itself from
him over his comments.
People inclined to blame Shirley's dismissal on "political correctness"
would be well advised to read his post carefully and consider the
logical implications of what he suggests. He doesn't seem to think New
Orleans ought to be rebuilt, since it could get hit by a hurricane
again. He doesn't seem to think people should be allowed to live on the
coasts of Thailand and Sri Lanka, since there might be another tsunami.
What he suggests for Haiti and Africa is even more extreme. Defending
Paul Shirley's right to self-expression is easy. Defending his
opinions, which amount to "starve the poor so they don't make babies,"
is a little more difficult.
It seems that "the rest of the world" he invoked in his open letter to
Haiti has also expressed its opinion -- not universally, of course, but
loudly enough that ESPN couldn't ignore it.
Maybe he will "learn from his mistake" and never write up anything as foolish as this again.
What ever happened to being human and helping out your fellow brother or sister in a time of need?