Police Kill Unarmed Teen In Ferguson, Missouri

 
you make no sense what so ever .... 

never said you brought it up.... but you're in here talking about it, then getting mad when others have an opinion on it ...lol 

bye felecia 
I make perfect sense. If you can't understand, that's on you
 
So in the conference given they stated they were concerned about the validity of the witnesses who were telling what happened, even though all the storied told or along similar lines from eye witnesses which goes against the only story given by the police chief. Now they are going to go to work to discredit any witness that comes forward.
 
So in the conference given they stated they were concerned about the validity of the witnesses who were telling what happened, even though all the storied told or along similar lines from eye witnesses which goes against the only story given by the police chief. Now they are going to go to work to discredit any witness that comes forward.

racism white supremacy is brilliant, ain't it?
 
So in the conference given they stated they were concerned about the validity of the witnesses who were telling what happened, even though all the storied told or along similar lines from eye witnesses which goes against the only story given by the police chief. Now they are going to go to work to discredit any witness that comes forward.
You guys really have absolutely no idea how an investigation works, do you?  For starters, there is a federal civil rights investigator and the FBI conducting their own inquiry as to what happened.  That means, they have to identify any potential witnesses and take statements from them.  After all potential evidence is gathered, a grand jury is convened to determine whether charges will be brought against the officer.  The discrediting of witnesses occurs at the time of a criminal trial where either side tries to impeach the credibility of the witness, which in this case, will likely include the officer's testimony.

In that regard, if there were in fact death threats made against the police officer involved, withholding his identity at this time is more than reasonable.  That doesn't mean there's a cover-up, because the identity of the officer will eventually be made known as the investigation nears its end.   If you guys are going to get so emotionally riled up about this case, do some of your own research and know what you're talking about instead of making ASSumptions about everything based on your OWN prejudices about the police.
 
You act like ppl have faith in corrupt systems of government.

Ppl are fed up and don't care for formalities right now.
 
You guys really have absolutely no idea how an investigation works, do you?  For starters, there is a federal civil rights investigator and the FBI conducting their own inquiry as to what happened.  That means, they have to identify any potential witnesses and take statements from them.  After all potential evidence is gathered, a grand jury is convened to determine whether charges will be brought against the officer.  The discrediting of witnesses occurs at the time of a criminal trial where either side tries to impeach the credibility of the witness, which in this case, will likely include the officer's testimony.

In that regard, if there were in fact death threats made against the police officer involved, withholding his identity at this time is more than reasonable.  That doesn't mean there's a cover-up, because the identity of the officer will eventually be made known as the investigation nears its end.   If you guys are going to get so emotionally riled up about this case, do some of your own research and know what you're talking about instead of making ASSumptions about everything based on your OWN prejudices about the police.

Blah blah and when the trial takes place watch all the eye witnesses get their character assassinated so their accounts can be discredited.
 
You act like ppl have faith in corrupt systems of government.

Ppl are fed up and don't care for formalities right now.
understandable.... but what does that have to do with people being educated on how the process works? 
 
Blah blah and when the trial takes place watch all the eye witnesses get their character assassinated so their accounts can be discredited.
annddddd.... what exactly does that have to do with what he said? 

he never said that wouldn't happen... all he did was state the process in which these things get investigated 

NT really NT'ing today
 
understandable.... but what does that have to do with people being educated on how the process works? 

Knowing steps in a process doesn't stop the police them from shooting black men down in the streets like dogs.

An innocent unarmed man can't survive a walk down the street, but actual terrorist still get to live to tell their story?

And whytf do the police have on all that infantry gear on? What the help are they prepared for. They got all that stuff already so the need has already been legitimized by them for the need to gave battlefield equipment in suburban america
 
How the * you gonna sit here and say its BS? You really believe he was just havin a tea party and got blown away for no reason? Just wait and see before you discredit it.
 
Blah blah and when the trial takes place watch all the eye witnesses get their character assassinated so their accounts can be discredited.
And who do you think makes the final determination as to whether a witness is credible?  If all witnesses always told the truth, there would be no need for trials anymore, now would there?  If I said xCautioNx is an idiot, should my statement automatically be deemed the truth?  If I was lying, wouldn't it make sense for someone to try to discredit me?
Which is BS, they're trying to go the Zimmerman route.
Well, since YOU already know exactly what happened, I guess you should contact the FBI and tell them that there's no need for any investigation.
 
BS like I said, all witness accounts discredit the BS about the cop being "attacked" in his own car. BS a mile away...
 
Knowing steps in a process doesn't stop the police them from shooting black men down in the streets like dogs.

An innocent unarmed man can't survive a walk down the street, but actual terrorist still get to live to tell their story?

And whytf do the police have on all that infantry gear on? What the help are they prepared for. They got all that stuff already so the need has already been legitimized by them for the need to gave battlefield equipment in suburban america
we get that... 

but dude was just outlining the steps in the process... 

he didn't say the system worked ... and i think that's what y'all were taking it as --- and still are
 
They're also claiming that a side of the cops face was swollen
 
Last edited:
Cops already lied about Michael Brown stealing that was disproved by the employee working at the store.

So now we are supposed to believe that they are being honest?
 
Logical reasoning: a teenager with no criminal history, who had just graduated high school and was about to start college would have no reason, nor would it be in his character to "attack" a police offer and attempt to take his gun. Sounds pretty dumb actually, but hey it worked for Zimmerman.
 
Last edited:
Logical reasoning: a teenager with no criminal history, who had just graduated high school and was about to start college would have no reason, nor would it be in his character to "attack" a police offer and attempt to take his gun. Sounds pretty dumb actually, but hey it worked for Zimmerman.
It would also be just as illogical for a policeman to kill somebody who was doing "absolutely nothing". No person, let alone cop, in their right mind would do that. Both just as ludicrous sounding.
 
It would also be just as illogical for a policeman to kill somebody who was doing "absolutely nothing". No person, let alone cop, in their right mind would do that. Both just as ludicrous sounding.

Like Oscar Grant and the Bart pig?
 
Back
Top Bottom