- 294
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
Anyone know what time the dlc goes up?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
If you feel comfortable buying one online, amazon has the 120GB in stock right now .Originally Posted by air234ever
my ps3 died 2 months ago. finally decide to get the new slim went to atleast 8 stores with no luck .....What's up with sony ???.....
maybe it'll have a backstory with chloe and their relationship?Originally Posted by GUTTA SAUCE
wat why doggy? so theres no chloe or eliane if there would be a prequel.?Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks
i was reading that uncharted 3 will be a prequel
anyone else read this
uncharted 2 was so freaking dope btw i love that game to death.. to the death georgie to the death.
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
Originally Posted by Notorious 858
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
Right just like how the "Exclusive" download able episodic content for GTA IV would NEVER come to the PS3
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
Maybe M$ passing on the game is a sign that the exclusivity is not an issue. Bungie would not be stupid enough to present the game to M$ say it has no plans to put on the PS3 then all a sudden change it up when they get a new publisher.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
that still doesnt answer your "bungie wont be developing for the ps3" - if this publisher isnt microsoft, they decide what platforms its going on
and bungie will decide whether they develop it for ps3 or turn it down and have some outside company port it over
are you trying to say that bungie is actually banned from developing for the ps3?
vintuc wrote:
Ay Chris, where is that steve nash gif from?
I don't know... I think a commercial he did that aired around All Star.
I saw it and just wanted to use it....
Health, it's not worth it. Clearly Rustynails has no idea what he's talking about.
This cat is the new NobleKane. He NEVER posts anything unless it has soemthing to do with Microsoft.
You on the payroll, mademoiselle?
Damn son, are you really that dumb?Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe M$ passing on the game is a sign that the exclusivity is not an issue. Bungie would not be stupid enough to present the game to M$ say it has no plans to put on the PS3 then all a sudden change it up when they get a new publisher.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
that still doesnt answer your "bungie wont be developing for the ps3" - if this publisher isnt microsoft, they decide what platforms its going on
and bungie will decide whether they develop it for ps3 or turn it down and have some outside company port it over
are you trying to say that bungie is actually banned from developing for the ps3?Dude M$ probably employs more lawyers than Bungie has employees.
Plus Bungie will need M$ help to launch there next game and the fact the two companies will be working together closely for the next couple years because of Reach.
Originally Posted by MarTdiZzle23
maybe it'll have a backstory with chloe and their relationship?Originally Posted by GUTTA SAUCE
Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks
i was reading that uncharted 3 will be a prequel
anyone else read this
wat why doggy? so theres no chloe or eliane if there would be a prequel.?
uncharted 2 was so freaking dope btw i love that game to death.. to the death georgie to the death.
Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Damn son, are you really that dumb?Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe M$ passing on the game is a sign that the exclusivity is not an issue. Bungie would not be stupid enough to present the game to M$ say it has no plans to put on the PS3 then all a sudden change it up when they get a new publisher.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
that still doesnt answer your "bungie wont be developing for the ps3" - if this publisher isnt microsoft, they decide what platforms its going on
and bungie will decide whether they develop it for ps3 or turn it down and have some outside company port it over
are you trying to say that bungie is actually banned from developing for the ps3?Dude M$ probably employs more lawyers than Bungie has employees.
Plus Bungie will need M$ help to launch there next game and the fact the two companies will be working together closely for the next couple years because of Reach.
What part of Bungie is an LLC don't you understand? They stand on there own, as a company, nobody to answer to, especially Microsoft. Besides the Halo franchise, any new IP does not have to pass through Microsoft, nor is Bungie obligated to show Microsoft it's new IP(s). If Bungie wanted to make Teatherball Ultra All-Stars and release it for PS3, they could. Whether it's Capcom, EA, 2k, Namco, Rockstar etc. it doesn't matter. They can release any non HALO game on PS3, Wii, DSi, PSP, Dreamcast, SNES.
What the hell are you talking about?Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Damn son, are you really that dumb?Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe M$ passing on the game is a sign that the exclusivity is not an issue. Bungie would not be stupid enough to present the game to M$ say it has no plans to put on the PS3 then all a sudden change it up when they get a new publisher.Originally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Maybe Microsoft chose not to publish the game. Ever thought about that. Funding the development for the game is cheaper than publishing and marketing it. And Microsoft is not stupid, they would have thought ahead to Bungie's next IPOriginally Posted by TheHealthInspector
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
How smart would it for Bungie to develop for the PS3 when by default MS would be the publisher for the game. How dumb would it be to have MS publishing the 360, PC version and have to look for a second publisher for the PS3 version. No company is that stupid to sabotage themselves like that.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Halo produce IP's ONLY. Bungie is it's own separate company, if they wanted to make a (non HALO) game for the PS3 right now Microsoft couldn't do @+%$.Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Microsoft still has a minority stake and have the right of first refusal on all Bungie's future games. Bungie will not be developing for the PS3.Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
Keyword.Originally Posted by theprocessofbelief
I thought Bungie was owned by Microsoft?
did you even read about Bungie looking for a publisher for a new IP of theirs back in july of 09? why would they be looking for a publisher if microsoft is their default publisher like you say?
they have agreements with microsoft but outside of those agreements, they can do whatever they want, microsoft doesnt have majority ownership in bungie
that still doesnt answer your "bungie wont be developing for the ps3" - if this publisher isnt microsoft, they decide what platforms its going on
and bungie will decide whether they develop it for ps3 or turn it down and have some outside company port it over
are you trying to say that bungie is actually banned from developing for the ps3?Dude M$ probably employs more lawyers than Bungie has employees.
Plus Bungie will need M$ help to launch there next game and the fact the two companies will be working together closely for the next couple years because of Reach.
What part of Bungie is an LLC don't you understand? They stand on there own, as a company, nobody to answer to, especially Microsoft. Besides the Halo franchise, any new IP does not have to pass through Microsoft, nor is Bungie obligated to show Microsoft it's new IP(s). If Bungie wanted to make Teatherball Ultra All-Stars and release it for PS3, they could. Whether it's Capcom, EA, 2k, Namco, Rockstar etc. it doesn't matter. They can release any non HALO game on PS3, Wii, DSi, PSP, Dreamcast, SNES.
Calling me dumb and you don't know what you talking about,
Bungie is an LLC, I know but they are not free to act in the same manner as other independent studios because of specific conditions of their deal with MS. First Microsoft still owns a part of Bungie, know one knows how big but is rumored to be a good size. They just don't own a controlling stake anymore
Next Bungie is obligated to show M$ any new games they develop first to allow M$ to make a decision on whether or not they want to publish the game, they have to do this before the shop the game around to other publishers because no publisher will agree to publishing a game if M$ still has the legal right to void the deal and become the publisher for said game.
So if a Bungie game comes to PS3 it is because:
1. Either Microsoft allows it
2. Some company decides it would be a good idea to publish and market a PS3 edition of a Bungie multiplatform knowing that M$ is going to run a concurrent marketing campaign for the 360.
3. Bungie themselves decide to fund development and publish a PS3 game and in he process alienate their part owners, fansbase, and risk putting the company into debt
So tell me genius, how likely do any of these scenrios sound.
Originally Posted by IHeartBoost
I give up, since dude knows more about Bungie than all of us, I guess we will never see Teatherball Ultra All-Stars on PS3.