R.I.P Trayvon

heard on the radio that if TM lived... he'd be facing aggravated assault, battery (sp?) being the lesser charge...

:x
 
heard on the radio that if TM lived... he'd be facing aggravated assault, battery (sp?) being the lesser charge...

:x


@ least he would be able to tell his side of the story in court.

Zimmerman couldn't just come up with a story that has changed multiple times and everybody just rock with it like it's fact.
 
Last edited:
He had a 3.7 gpa

Source?

To my understanding, his academic records were never released.

They weren't but he was in one of the best public schools in Miami and his teachers have come out and said he was an A and B student. Not that it matters, like if he was a C Student, that doesn't make you any more or less likely to commit a crime, and doesn't justify him being profiled.
 
I read about that Jordan Davis case, smh. Just another example of us being targeted...music, really? At least this idiot Dunn was drunk and driving and he's charged with 1st degree murder...when is that trial beginning? I really hope that dude doesn't walk as well, that seems like an even more clear case than Trayvons since there were his friends in the car who were all witnesses and could've been hit as well. Seriously Florida, wtf?!?
 
Because im smart and i know that 3/4 of protestors are only looking for reason to cause violence and express their own problem with their life.

Agree with this. A lot of legitimate protestors who were peacefully gathering and voicing their disgust. But then a lot of angry, bad apples simply caught up in the mob mentality wanting to cause destruction. Then you have the people who gather and just stand around so they can "be part of something" big.

"A tragedy for America." Minorities are being profiled by police and killed everyday. Bogus decisions are made in courts across the US every minute. Where was Obama's support up until now?

PS Nothing to do @ work now that the trial is finished :nerd:
 
I love how we focus on what type of person Martin might have been

But we ignore Zimmerman's arrest record, the restraining order by his ex-finace, the sexual allegations and multiple people at his work saying he was a bully. Also how multiple people said his family had a culture of racism.

He's obviously a guy who's very capable of unprovoked aggression
 
Last edited:
The Jordan Davis and Trayvon Martin doesnt even compare except they were both Black. Comparison is a reach.

Dunn -> Drunk, heard music and shot into a car for no reason at all like 10 times

Zimmerman -> Allegedly got his *** whooped, took out a gun and shot Trayvon once in self-defense


Ironically, Stand Your Ground didnt apply in Zimmerman's case, nor will it in the Jordan Davis case. Dunn will be going to jail for life.
 
The Jordan Davis case is open and shut

There were witnesses outside of the car and inside the car and security cams @ the gas station.

Dunn will most definitely get life in prison.
 
My point is that Zimmerman identifying himself as white should have been allowed at trial.As well as other aspects of this case- more specifically Zimmerman's 911 call, and Trayvon using the word "cracker". I think the judge disallowing discussion of race was ludicrous, as the case is soaked in it. Even the crimes reported in the area had racial connotations.

For what? That would set a horrible precedent. Should his religion and sexual orientation be admissible too? :lol:
 
The Jordan Davis and Trayvon Martin doesnt even compare except they were both Black. Comparison is a reach.

Dunn -> Drunk, heard music and shot into a car for no reason at all like 10 times

Zimmerman -> Allegedly got his *** whooped, took out a gun and shot Trayvon once in self-defense


Ironically, Stand Your Ground didnt apply in Zimmerman's case, nor will it in the Jordan Davis case. Dunn will be going to jail for life.

We hope so but I just read the article. Dunn is going to try to use stand your ground but a key difference is there is a witness this time. (The girlfriend)
 
We hope so but I just read the article. Dunn is going to try to use stand your ground but a key difference is there is a witness this time. (The girlfriend)

They really need to do away with this stand your ground nonsense immediately. Leaves waaaay too much open to interpretation.
 
My point is that Zimmerman identifying himself as white should have been allowed at trial.As well as other aspects of this case- more specifically Zimmerman's 911 call, and Trayvon using the word "cracker". I think the judge disallowing discussion of race was ludicrous, as the case is soaked in it. Even the crimes reported in the area had racial connotations.

For what? That would set a horrible precedent. Should his religion and sexual orientation be admissible too? :lol:

Wait do they ask for your religion and sexual orientation on government forms and job applications?

But I'm pretty sure they ask your race
 
Last edited:
And that Dunn idiot didn't claim SYG until he hired a lawyer. Check what he told detectives while they were questioning him:
They defied my orders. What was I supposed to do if they wouldn't listen?
sick.gif
sick.gif
sick.gif
 
The Jordan Davis and Trayvon Martin doesnt even compare except they were both Black. Comparison is a reach.

Dunn -> Drunk, heard music and shot into a car for no reason at all like 10 times

Zimmerman -> Allegedly got his *** whooped, took out a gun and shot Trayvon once in self-defense


Ironically, Stand Your Ground didnt apply in Zimmerman's case, nor will it in the Jordan Davis case. Dunn will be going to jail for life.

We hope so but I just read the article. Dunn is going to try to use stand your ground but a key difference is there is a witness this time. (The girlfriend)


Dunn told the cops he didn't need a lawyer, telling the detectives: " They defied my orders. What was I supposed to do if they wouldn't listen?"

Even if his gf lied for him, there are multiple witnesses including people in the vehicle that was shot up by Dunn.
 
They really need to do away with this stand your ground nonsense immediately. Leaves waaaay too much open to interpretation.

It really doesnt. If somebody is APPROACHING you, you have the right to Stand Your Ground. Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, thus not having the ability to leave. Jordan Davis never approached Dunn.


And that Dunn idiot didn't claim SYG until he hired a lawyer.

Of course, that's what defense attorney do. What do you want him to do, just come out and say "Hey, my client is guilty"?



BTW, that map is inaccurate per Zimmerman reenactment and the Prosecution's theory.
 
Last edited:
It really doesnt. If somebody is APPROACHING you, you have the right to Stand Your Ground. Trayvon was on top of Zimmerman, thus not having the ability to leave. Jordan Davis never approached Dunn.

It's hard to determine who was approaching who when deadly force is justified under the law and one of the combatants is dead. Stand your ground + justifiable deadly force = :smh:

I see what you're saying though.
 
And that Dunn idiot didn't claim SYG until he hired a lawyer.
Of course, that's what defense attorney do. What do you want him to do, just come out and say "Hey, my client is guilty"?
 
Brah, what the **** are you talking about? When did I ever say that? I was adding to the fact that the Dunn case will be open and shut and is nowhere near the same as the GZ case.
 
Wait do they ask for your religion and sexual orientation on government forms and job applications?

What does what he identifies himself racially have anything to do with the case? Because it's on a "government form?" Nah, that's a slippery slope.

I told you why they could ask

How's it a slippery slope?

Is it a "slippery slope" when they ask your race on drivers licenses and voter registration form?
 
Loving Your Enemies.
by Martin Luther King, Jr.
The following sermon was delivered at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama, at Christmas, 1957. Martin Luther King wrote it whi1e in jail far committing nonviolent civil disobedience during the Montgomery bus boycott. Let us be practical and ask the question. How do we love our enemies?

First, we must develop and maintain the capacity to forgive. He who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power to love. It is impossible even to begin the act of loving one's enemies without the prior acceptance of the necessity, over and over again, of forgiving those who inflict evil and injury upon us. It is also necessary to realize that the forgiving act must always be initiated by the person who has been wronged, the victim of some great hurt, the recipient of some tortuous injustice, the absorber of some terrible act of oppression. The wrongdoer may request forgiveness. He may come to himself, and, like the prodigal son, move up some dusty road, his heart palpitating with the desire for forgiveness. But only the injured neighbor, the loving father back home, can really pour out the warm waters of forgiveness.

Forgiveness does not mean ignoring what has been done or putting a false label on an evil act. It means, rather, that the evil act no longer remains as a barrier to the relationship. Forgiveness is a catalyst creating the atmosphere necessary for a fresh start and a new beginning. It is the lifting of a burden or the canceling of a debt. The words "I will forgive you, but I'll never forget what you've done" never explain the real nature of forgiveness. Certainly one can never forget, if that means erasing it totally from his mind. But when we forgive, we forget in the sense that the evil deed is no longer a mental block impeding a new relationship. Likewise, we can never say, "I will forgive you, but I won't have anything further to do with you." Forgiveness means reconciliation, a coming together again.

Without this, no man can love his enemies. The degree to which we are able to forgive determines the degree to which we are able to love our enemies.

Second, we must recognize that the evil deed of the enemy-neighbor, the thing that hurts, never quite expresses all that he is. An element of goodness may be found even in our worst enemy. Each of us has something of a schizophrenic personality, tragically divided against ourselves. A persistent civil war rages within all of our lives. Something within us causes us to lament with Ovid, the Latin poet, "I see and approve the better things, but follow worse," or to agree with Plato that human personality is like a charioteer having two headstrong horses, each wanting to go in a different direction, or to repeat with the Apostle Paul, "The good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do."

This simply means that there is some good in the worst of us and some evil in the best of us. When we discover this, we are less prone to hate our enemies. When we look beneath the surface, beneath. the impulsive evil deed, we see within our enemy-neighbor a measure of goodness and know that the viciousness and evilness of his acts are not quite representative of all that he is. We see him in a new light. We recognize that his hate grows out of fear, pride, ignorance, prejudice, and misunderstanding, but in spite of this, we know God's image is ineffably etched in being. Then we love our enemies by realizing that they are not totally bad and that they are not beyond the reach of God's redemptive love.

Third, we must not seek to defeat or humiliate the enemy but to win his friendship and understanding. At times we are able to humiliate our worst enemy. Inevitably, his weak moments come and we are able to thrust in his side the spear of defeat. But this we must not do. Every word and deed must contribute to an understanding with the enemy and release those vast reservoirs of goodwill which have been blocked by impenetrable walls of hate.

Let us move now from the practical how to the theoretical why: Why should we love our enemies? The first reason is fairly obvious. Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Hate multiplies hate, violence multiplies violence, and toughness multi# plies toughness in a descending spiral of destruction.

So when Jesus says "Love your enemies," he is setting forth a profound and ultimately inescapable admonition. Have we not come to such an impasse in the modern world that we must love our enemies-or else? The chain reaction of evil-hate begetting hate, wars producing more wars-must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.

Another reason why we must love our enemies is that hate scars the soul and distorts the personality. Mindful that hate is an evil and dangerous force, we too often think of what it does to the person hated. This is understandable, for hate brings irreparable damage to its victims. We have seen its ugly consequences in the ignominious deaths brought to six million Jews by hate-obsessed madman named Hitler, in the unspeakable violence inflicted upon Negroes by bloodthirsty mobs, in the dark horrors of war, and in the terrible indignities and injustices perpetrated against millions of God's children by unconscionable oppressors.

But there is another side which we must never overlook. Hate is just as injurious to the person who hates. Like an unchecked cancer, hate corrodes the personality and eats away its vital unity. Hate destroys a man's sense of values and his objectivity. It causes him to describe the beautiful as ugly and the ugly as beautiful, and to confuse the true with the false and the false with the true.

A third reason why we should love our enemies is that love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a friend. We never get rid of an enemy by meeting hate with hate; we get rid of an enemy by getting rid of enmity. By its very nature, hate destroys and tears down; by its very nature, love creates and builds up. Love transforms with redemptive power.

The relevance of what I have said to the crisis in race relations should be readily apparent. There will be no permanent solution to the, race problem until oppressed men develop the capacity to love their enemies. The darkness of racial injustice will be dispelled only by the light of forgiving love. For more than three centuries American Negroes have been battered by the iron rod of oppression, frustrated by day and bewildered by night by unbearable injustice and burdened with the ugly weight of discrimination. Forced to live with these shameful conditions, we are tempted to become bitter and to retaliate with a corresponding hate. But if this happens, the new order we seek will be little more than a duplicate of the old order. We must in strength and humility meet hate with love.

My friends, we have followed the so-called practical way for too long a time now, and it has led inexorably to deeper confusion and chaos. Time is cluttered with the wreckage of communities which surrendered to hatred and violence. For the salvation of our nation and the salvation of mankind, we must follow another way.

While abhorring segregation, we shall love the segregationist. This is the only way to create the beloved community.

To our most bitter opponents we say: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you. Bomb our homes and threaten our children, and we shall still love you. Send your hooded perpetrators of violence into our community at the midnight hour and beat us and leave us half dead, and we shall still love you. But be ye assured that we will wear you down by our capacity to suffer. One day we shall win freedom but not only for ourselves. We shall so appeal to your heart and conscience that we shall win you in the process and our victory will be a double victory."
 
Back
Top Bottom