- 87,865
- 50,387
I assume red priestesses will be with them.
Not really a plot hole. They just weren't shown in the finale.
Not really a plot hole. They just weren't shown in the finale.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ughhh going to have to suffer the next year with all u r+l guys thinking that was 100% confirmation
Which is why he usurped during the sack of kings landing.tywin didn't seem the type to let that happen without some kind of clap back.
tdogg2k I'm still waiting for you to reference the books as to where you got your A+L=J theory from.
When i get home ill see if i can dig up my old post ( at work using mobile now so dont feel like typing it up)
But yes.
It's within the kings rights. On top of those fools weren't bour that king slaying life.
I also don't understand how the people who believe in the dragon has a 3 heads prophecy . And believe dany is 1. Tyrion is 2 both fathered by aerys ( tyrion possibly) then how do you not think jon wpuldnt have the same father.
Only other outcome i can think of is if young griff is real...
And jon is possibly meant for the ice dragon theory.
When they first got there Arthur Dayne specifically says that the Prince ( Rhaegar ) wanted him there and that's why they weren't at the Fork
Aerys raping Tywin's wife would perfectly explain why he basically hates Tyrion similar to Cat hating Jon.
If course Tyson keeps it quiet and then does nothing to help then goes against the Mad king.
It's a shame finding this out is gonna rely on more Bran flashbacks for the show next year.
Jon being Dany's brother not nephew is better theamtically.
As far as the show goes to me it seems like going with R+L=J is somewhat of a reach given they haven't even shown Rhaegar on the show at all. Tv watchers are getting all of that from book reader theories.
When they first got there Arthur Dayne specifically says that the Prince ( Rhaegar ) wanted him there and that's why they weren't at the Fork
You cant tell me im going against the grain just to go when im speaking purely book facts. And what we know is that only the KING controls the king guard. And taking orders from rhaegar instead of the king would be hints to treason /usurping which would prove another point ive made in here also.
Youre mixing show and book details. And im not doing that. According to the show dayne and whent werent kg but soldiers of targareyon and dayne weilded 2 swords (which we can safely assume was not the deal in the book)
How ridiculous is to be like "well d&f said they guessed jon snow parents correctly so they got to direct the show...." everyone who has read the first book put 1 and 1 together how is that some magical feat that D&D did and no one else who wanted to direct the show could guess????
Do you really think it was that easy.???
Im assuming you guys havent read many of grrms other books. It isnt hard at all to see him doing A+L over R+L due to other hints. Other than the "obvious" hints he has for R+L
This is why I've always said. Damn if he does damn if he doesnt.
If he makes it R+l. Everyone will give themselves a big pat on the back for "figuring out it was him"
But if its A+L. He switched it up to throw people off intentionally blah blah blah.
So a ton of butt hurt people because they were wrong or refused to read deeper in to it. Which is grrms style.
So you basically just said, "there are circumstances and situations where 3 kingsguard being assigned to follow Rhaegar out of the capitol and to follow his orders would make sense."
I don't remember all the details to the Aerys + Lyanna theory, so why did Aerys send the KG to the tower? Also why did they stay there after Kings Landing fell and Aery's died? In regards to the theory.Im not a conformist and ivr read deeper
If the king gives leave for them too.
And why during war would the king give leave to his KG lord commander, best fighters and another strong warrior?