- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,525
- 21,114
He should rock a mullet like Alistair did in the cartoon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. Fiancé's uncle bought a 3-D 4k TV and I really couldn't tell the difference between 1080p and 4k...Also, I don't need 3D to enjoy a movie. SMH. I swear that was just a hype.
The suit is incredible. That IS Spiderman
I love the new uni for this film. The film has the costume and Peter Parker right. I love it.They took Spider-Man right out the comic book pages and turned him real. Looking forward to this movie.
i believe this will be the movie where Gwen Stacy dies.
Am I the only one who enjoys character development instead of rushing 5 villains into one 2 1/2 hr movie.
I might be in the minority but I didn't read many comics as a youngn. I'd like to understand the villains like some of you guys.
Most of the villains are pretty bland and can be summed up in 2-3 mins of backstory.
O no doubt, the the guys that make up the 6 are for the most part not. Not to say they aren't cool, just not deepSome villains like hammerhead or Rhino are simple but some like green goblin and venom are pretty cool villains
i believe this will be the movie where Gwen Stacy dies.
Nah, there's enough going on in the film as is. They still need more time for Gwen to be established with the audience.
That was a terrible turrible horrible story line. I hope not.Holy ****....holy ****!!!!!! Gwen's moving to England....ARE THEY GOING TO DO SINS PAST?!?!?!????!!!!
That was a terrible turrible horrible story line. I hope not.
It's nothing to be afraid of. If you read the earlier comics and then read this it doesn't make sense and it's just bad storytelling. Without Gabriel and Sarah the story makes even less sense. Gwen bangs Norman and.....? The whole thing was about the mystery twins wanting revenge for one dude who they thought was their father only to find out it was their crazy benefactor all along who lied to them. When trying to match that up to the Lee and Thomas stories it makes even less sense since she ditches her children and gets back with Pete until she dies. It adds no depth to her death story either, it actually takes away from it.That was a terrible turrible horrible story line. I hope not.
I thought the storyline was dope it's just the whole Gabriel and Sarah thing that threw it off. It adds another level of complexity to the Gwen Stacy story. People are just afraid of the thought of Gwen being a bop and for Norman Osborn of all people. If they could put their own spin on it for the film and leave out the twins of course, Gwen's death will be that much more polarizing when it eventually occurs.
It's nothing to be afraid of. If you read the earlier comics and then read this it doesn't make sense and it's just bad storytelling. Without Gabriel and Sarah the story makes even less sense. Gwen bangs Norman and.....? The whole thing was about the mystery twins wanting revenge for one dude who they thought was their father only to find out it was their crazy benefactor all along who lied to them. When trying to match that up to the Lee and Thomas stories it makes even less sense since she ditches her children and gets back with Pete until she dies. It adds no depth to her death story either, it actually takes away from it.
Hopefully it's just a head nod to the story for the sake of it. It'd probably make less sense in the movie cuz then you'd have to time skip at least 10 months or have Gwen absent for a whole movie.
I'd rather they kill her than try to adapt that story. Norman has enough children that are crazy.
How does this give more layers to Gwen? She banged Norman cuz he she "couldn't resist him", had twins, left them, then got killed by her baby daddy. These characters were created in the 60s. I'm not seeing any reason why Gwen has to be anything other than what she is whether yall simply see her as a squeaky clean love interest or not. **** the MJ vs. Gwen debate. Gwen is dead. MJ is alive. That story isn't just drama filled it's twisted Jerry Springer/Maury show ****. Keep in mind the writer of the story intended for it to be completely erased from continuity he had planned for another story line and he originally intended for the children to actually be Peter's but the editors told him no (cuz they didn't want Spidey to be a parent), so he settled for Norman.It's nothing to be afraid of. If you read the earlier comics and then read this it doesn't make sense and it's just bad storytelling. Without Gabriel and Sarah the story makes even less sense. Gwen bangs Norman and.....? The whole thing was about the mystery twins wanting revenge for one dude who they thought was their father only to find out it was their crazy benefactor all along who lied to them. When trying to match that up to the Lee and Thomas stories it makes even less sense since she ditches her children and gets back with Pete until she dies. It adds no depth to her death story either, it actually takes away from it.
Hopefully it's just a head nod to the story for the sake of it. It'd probably make less sense in the movie cuz then you'd have to time skip at least 10 months or have Gwen absent for a whole movie.
I'd rather they kill her than try to adapt that story. Norman has enough children that are crazy.
Of course the story isn't canon but it's the only story that doesn't show Gwen as this squeaky clean love of Peter's life. Gives more layer to the Gwen vs. MJ debate as well because Gwen is without a doubt peter's true love but what if she had a past too? I mean banging your homeboys dad/arch nemesis is kinda drama filled. Norman discovering peter's identity and choosing Gwen to throw off the George Washington instead of Aunt May always puzzled me so the sins past story was kind've like a missing puzzle to the story to me. I don't know, it just seems like it would be well interpreted on film to me, minus the twins of course.
How does this give more layers to Gwen? She banged Norman cuz he she "couldn't resist him", had twins, left them, then got killed by her baby daddy. These characters were created in the 60s. I'm not seeing any reason why Gwen has to be anything other than what she is whether yall simply see her as a squeaky clean love interest or not. **** the MJ vs. Gwen debate. Gwen is dead. MJ is alive. That story isn't just drama filled it's twisted Jerry Springer/Maury show ****. Keep in mind the writer of the story intended for it to be completely erased from continuity he had planned for another story line and he originally intended for the children to actually be Peter's but the editors told him no (cuz they didn't want Spidey to be a parent), so he settled for Norman.
Nah there was no missing puzzle. Norman found out who Spidey was and killed his gf. After returning, he targeted Aunt May as well. The puzzle isn't solved by him now deciding to kill the mother of his children just cuz she loved Peter. All it does is just add more crazy to Norman's crazy list.
Making Gwen interested in Norman in the movies is just plain laughable.