- 32,834
- 81,404
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2013
If only rings weren't an arbitrary stat to determine a player's worth.Their combined 0 championships approve of this viewpointIf I'm building a team I'm going with a scoring PG 90% of the time.
It's the exact opposite for me. I want a John Stockton/Steve Nash type PG.
Someone who can light you up if they need to but always have their mind on the pass first.
BJ Armstrong >>>>>>>>>>>> John Stockton amirite?
Unlike scoring PGs like Russell and Rose right? Oh wait......Them dudes don't win championships todayIf I'm building a team I'm going with a scoring PG 90% of the time.
It's the exact opposite for me. I want a John Stockton/Steve Nash type PG.
Someone who can light you up if they need to but always have their mind on the pass first.
When it comes to winning rings, the type of PG you have doesn't matter as long as that PG fits the system. The type of team you have does.
A defensive minded, pass first PG who scores when needed, but doesn't need to or want to carry the scoring load, is what I prefer and what I'd go with when building a team.
Clearly you guys would rather go with a scoring PG. All it is, is a difference in preference. No need to attempt to discredit my choice when I never did it to anyone else.