EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
I would happy with either Lonzo or Fultz
Both would make an impact on the Lakers
Both would make an impact on the Lakers
****The Everything LaVar Ball Thread****
- 57,797
- 61,459
Being in LA would for sure be good for his brand.
$tacy
formerly willchamberlain
- 26,243
- 25,186
I just pray for fultz b. He's gonna be an elite scorer and hes ust as good a play maker
- 12,992
- 5,248
I Thought Simmons last year was the generational prospect or we get them every year now
This... every year b
Embiid, uniborw, towns, now fultz... safe to say in this day and age everybelite prospect becomes a once in a genration guy haha fultz is a significantly worse prospect than any of those 7 footers
- 4,151
- 2,495
I Thought Simmons last year was the generational prospect or we get them every year now
. every ******* year it's a "once in a generational talent"
We've already had that talent in our generation. His name is lebrawn Jehmes
Defensive competency ranks so low my scale for PGs.
As long as you have decent size and try every now and again, you'll be fine
- 12,992
- 5,248
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,995
- 22,575
I can understand preferring Fultz over Lonzo. But to be mad if you happen to get Lonzo sounds dumb as hell. Dude is gonna be a good player in the League.
And yeah, all this once in a generation **** has to cease. The same cats hating on Lavar for putting all that pressure on Lonzo are the same ones calling Fultz a generational talent. Dude will never live up to that. Trust.
And yeah, all this once in a generation **** has to cease. The same cats hating on Lavar for putting all that pressure on Lonzo are the same ones calling Fultz a generational talent. Dude will never live up to that. Trust.
- 68,176
- 24,538
Simmons is a generational talent
Fultz is not considered that but he's the best of the bunch because he can play without or without the ball in his hands so he's a better fit for most teams
Fultz is not considered that but he's the best of the bunch because he can play without or without the ball in his hands so he's a better fit for most teams
Last edited:
- 82,610
- 117,987
Wouldn't shock me if Josh Jackson turn out to be the best. That kids potential is scary.
- 55,426
- 146,825
Fultz
Jackson
Isaac
Those are the top 3 prospects for those who know. This is a deep draft class though. Lonzo is the 4th or 5th best prospect.
Jackson
Isaac
Those are the top 3 prospects for those who know. This is a deep draft class though. Lonzo is the 4th or 5th best prospect.
- 68,176
- 24,538
Celts should take Jackson at #1 or trade the pick, Fultz means you almost have to move IT and Celts aren't in a rebuild
Fox > Ball
Fox > Ball
- 55,426
- 146,825
Fox isn't better than Ball mane
In fact....Dennis Smith is better than Fox too.
In fact....Dennis Smith is better than Fox too.
- 68,176
- 24,538
Get back to me in 5 years on that
- 82,610
- 117,987
What makes you think Fox is better than Lonzo? Or you just saying that cuz you don't like his father?
Or you just saying that cuz you don't like his father?
- 68,176
- 24,538
I like his game better, he is athletic as all hell, he will be a better shooter in the NBA IMO
don't be shocked if Fox is taken before Lonzo, I don't care about his dad when it comes to talent but I don't see Lonzo turning into a Jason Kidd type player like people say, I do see Fox turning into a Wall type player and being a legit second option on a contender
if the Sixers come away with Fox and Jackson I would be ecstatic if they can't get Fultz
don't be shocked if Fox is taken before Lonzo, I don't care about his dad when it comes to talent but I don't see Lonzo turning into a Jason Kidd type player like people say, I do see Fox turning into a Wall type player and being a legit second option on a contender
if the Sixers come away with Fox and Jackson I would be ecstatic if they can't get Fultz
Last edited:
Mr.Guy
formerly timidtebow
- 23,944
- 8,608
- 25,775
- 46,547
Or yall could trade the pick for your mans Kris Dunn right?
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,995
- 22,575
Cats still gassed off that UK/UCLA tourney game I see. Nobody talks about how Fox looked mighty pedestrian against UNC.
As an overall player, he isn't better than Ball. He doesn't bring as much to the table.
As an overall player, he isn't better than Ball. He doesn't bring as much to the table.
- 68,176
- 24,538
you better start reading because a lot of top teams are higher on Fox
- 25,775
- 46,547
Scouts still higher on Ball than Fox...the consensus top 3 right now is some order of Fultz, Ball and Josh Jackson
I'm taking Ball over Fox all day just off the fact that you know he can hit an open jumper...cant play in 2017 with a PG you cant trust to hit open shots like Fox, gotta hope he improves his shot alot
I'm taking Ball over Fox all day just off the fact that you know he can hit an open jumper...cant play in 2017 with a PG you cant trust to hit open shots like Fox, gotta hope he improves his shot alot
- 146,336
- 177,816
Not even hating on Lonzo but damn he's no generational talent
. At least not yet...
- 68,176
- 24,538
Not even hating on Lonzo but damn he's no generational talent
he's not at all, there is no generational talent in this draft but you know my man's TImid
Simmons game mirrors Lebron and Magic which is why he was labeled as a generational talent
- 146,336
- 177,816
I agree on Simmons though,can't wait to see him healthy. Philly might be the new C's if their young guys manage to stay healthy
Last edited:
