- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,538
Whose mans is this?
The Invincible Thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by 651akathepaul,
- Start date
- Status
- Jun 1, 2015
- 16,532
- 4,206
How could the Chargers win the North when they couldn't even beat the Browns cuz?
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,240
- 53,425
[thread="651382"]wtf did y'all drink?[/thread]
[thread="651382"] [/thread]
[thread="651382"]It's currently snowing where i'm at, around 4 inches so the city is shut down. [/thread]
[thread="651382"] [/thread]
[thread="651382"]But I still have to go do my 12-8 shift at the store :x [/thread]
Chardonnay, multiple beers, chardonnay.
I've turned weak.
you should stay home and watch football with your NT homies, bruh. **** the movies
- May 3, 2016
- 1,236
- 309
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
I'm so sorry....I wasnt talking about AFC North...I meant the South...my bad and I believe Chargers could beat Ravens easily...
- Jul 3, 2012
- 12,744
- 2,371
- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,538
Chargers couldn't even beat the Rams to LA
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
I meant the south...and that Browns lost...come.on the way we choked the season away, we was playing for a draft position at that point
Last edited:
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,817
- 30,214
Hooolllddd up!
Isn't hard to do?! It's just not that easy, man. If the Chargers were in the AFCN, there's a good chance their style of play and how their roster was put together, isn't remotely the same, rendering this entire discussion to be non-existent. You can't just assume hypothetical's and be taken seriously. Of course, we can't prove something that did not happen or was not the circumstance at the time, so all we can do is point to the fact that the history some of these teams have with each other makes it a whole new ballgame. Same with the Chargers and the AFCW....That division is historic as well, but the results don't carry over so seamlessly by assuming they (Chargers) or anybody would automatically be better just because they are playing in a different division that appears to be weaker. SD was competitive in a lot of games and played division rivals tough. Yeah, their division had really good teams and they can overall be considered the most "competitive" division, but given the rivalry aspect I alluded to, the Chargers were still far and away the worst in that division. And before you say it, injury happens and that's only the most recent explanation for San Diego.
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
Meant the AFC South guys...seesh...we went to H town and beat up they division winner
- Jan 2, 2010
- 82,859
- 118,435
Aight, now you making sense.
- Jun 1, 2015
- 16,532
- 4,206
It's all good man. AFC South slander is always accepted around here. It's encouraged actually. Ha ha ha
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,817
- 30,214
The AFCS does suck, overall. It's not like those teams are all collectively agreeing to suck though. Usually, teams are built to win the division because being a perennial divisional winner threat is the gateway to postseason success (Patriots, for example). Looking back, there were points in the season were Tennessee looked pretty strong. They were a tough out or had good wins against really good teams. The Texans aren't great, but the QB woes have greatly exaggerated what that team really is. They could be so much better with a competent quarterback, but that's not the point. Their defense, even after losing Watt, was still very tough and alone as a unit, is a playoff caliber group. They aren't without talent.
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
Thats what I meant from the get go...I'm sorry for the typo
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,817
- 30,214
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
Off subject... But do you guys think Rivers should go elsewhere and give himself a better chance to win?
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
Yes, as long as SD gets some picks out of it.
- May 3, 2016
- 1,236
- 309
Y'all also lost to Cleveland
- Jan 2, 2010
- 82,859
- 118,435
Chargers do need to blow that up. It ain't working. Teams would give them a lot for Rivers.
- Dec 17, 2005
- 23,933
- 5,933
You're going to lose to Connor cook today so hush bruh
- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Nov 9, 2013
- 334
- 39
Typo's are unacceptable.
Seesh I get it that was changed the affect of an whole division so I can see it...but typos in general are unacceptable... Seesh u guys are ruthless lol
- Apr 26, 2008
- 39,281
- 54,544
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,817
- 30,214
I hope not, but personally for Rivers, it might be best. He's how old and about to go through another regime change? He's a great quarterback, so it's a damn shame, but it happens.
- Status
