there's still people that think Kobe is better??? Lmao
Let me know when Kobe led his team back from a 3-1 deficit with no home court advantage.
Better yet, let me know when Kobe led a playoff series, let alone the finals, in damn near every statistical category not just on his team but the opposing team as well.
I'm in the Lebron is better than Kobe group, but not because of the statements above. Winning down 3-1 with no home court advantage isn't the reason why Lebron is better. Leading in every statistical category also isn't a reason why Lebron is better. These have no bearing.
Lebron is just better because he's, plain and simple, a better basketball player.
Thank you, thank you, thank you.
It gets absurd in every sports thread reading how someone is great or not great based on how many championships they won or didn't win.
Of course it's part of the equation but, at the end of the day, it comes down to who was the better player and that just comes down to who was the better player.
If you're at the gym picking teams, you don't choose the guy who won the most. You choose the guy who is the best at playing the game.
Resorting to looking at just winning is laziness. No better than trying to talk football with someone who only watched the super bowl.
Art is something that's still an on paper, wall, books, etc. I don't have to be in 1500's to realize art is beautiful.
I just can't truly say Bill Russell is a top 5 player without seeing anything more than a few highlights. I can say top 50 because its not nearly as specific.
I might have watched 10 minutes of Bill Russell or Wilt highlights in my lifetime. What the hell do i really know?
Art, music, you don't have to be from that era to give a true opinion about it. Sports, I do think you need to watch more than a few highlights to have an educated opinion.
My opinion. Its why i rarely venture into sports threads. At 41, I just feel stupid arguing with a 20 year about the 80's and 90's era of basketball. How can i argue with someone about Magic/Bird/Malone when they were still in the nut sack? Because they watched NBA TV?
I agree completely about basketball but not about art. Sure you can say you like art without having to be an expert. Same like you can like music or the way someone plays. But to really appreciate art you need to study it, you need to know the life of the painter and the era they were living in, what inspired them and how their work evolved, the city they lived in, etc. And then you know the art, at least as much as you can without having lived in that era.
Likewise if all you saw was one clip of LeBron blocking Curry, do you think you understand? Or does it not add to the story to know that LeBron left Cleveland but then came back, to know how much of a favorite GSW was, to know how every pundit was discussing GSW as the greatest ever, to know that no one thought you could come back from 3-1, the doubts over LeBron in crunch time, and a million other things. The next generation is not going to get that from watching a clip on espn classic in 30 years.