- 80,694
- 55,639
On that training day Denzel steez
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't the cap getting bigger or something? GS should be able to retain most of their players.
I have posted this time and time again. Also posted the spotrac page of the Warriors contract situations moving forward.
People just choose to ignore them and go with the baseless narrative that we wont be able to afford to retain our players.
Dude is much different on the podcasts ESPN has him out there like a damn mascotThis. All this. Too bad he can't be as "cool" as he is on his podcast.
Next season, we have roughly $74M committed. The salary cap is projected to be at $92M. Like many have said, the Warriors ownership has repeatedly said they are willing to pay the luxury tax.Doesn't that depend/impact what you guys want to do in free agencyI have posted this time and time again. Also posted the spotrac page of the Warriors contract situations moving forward.Isn't the cap getting bigger or something? GS should be able to retain most of their players.
People just choose to ignore them and go with the baseless narrative that we wont be able to afford to retain our players.
Like if Barnes and/or ezeli sign offer sheets and you get the certain amount of days to decide.. And if you do match doesn't that severely what you guys can do?
You can use iso as means to bait the other 4 defenders into ball watching & take advantage of that.
That's just flat out dumb. Not his ability with the ball, but the defense of his iso ball.
Just for comparison sake I wonder what the average was from Westbrook to durant and curry to klayMarc Stein
Marc Stein – Verified account @ESPNSteinLine
According to the incomparable @MicahAdams13, LeBron James has taken one shot in these NBA Finals directly after a Kyrie Irving pass. #one
2:01 PM - 7 Jun 2016
Can someone post that parody video again? Not trying to look through the whole thread to find it. Thanks in advance.
Ayesha Curry [emoji]10004[/emoji] @ayeshacurry
@TMART_ESPN nope not true at all actually. But thanks for the assumption!
11:26 AM - 7 Jun 2016
Next season, we have roughly $74M committed. The salary cap is projected to be at $92M. Like many have said, the Warriors ownership has repeatedly said they are willing to pay the luxury tax.
Isn't the cap getting bigger or something? GS should be able to retain most of their players.
I have posted this time and time again. Also posted the spotrac page of the Warriors contract situations moving forward.
People just choose to ignore them and go with the baseless narrative that we wont be able to afford to retain our players.
Doesn't that depend/impact what you guys want to do in free agency
Like if Barnes and/or ezeli sign offer sheets and you get the certain amount of days to decide.. And if you do match doesn't that severely what you guys can do?
Fast foward to the season after. We only have $35M in salary committed (granted Steph will need to be extended).
The Warriors will be fine. People waiting for us to blow this team up for financial reasons are hoping, not waiting.
Darren Rovell [emoji]10004[/emoji] @darrenrovell
With a cookbook, a TV show, a licensed product line & a restaurant, @ayeshacurry is on the rise http://es.pn/1Y5VWwl
7:46 AM - 7 Jun 2016
TMART @TMART_ESPN
@darrenrovell @ayeshacurry @espnW with stephs money for start up
Ayesha Curry [emoji]10004[/emoji] @ayeshacurry
@TMART_ESPN nope not true at all actually. But thanks for the assumption!
11:26 AM - 7 Jun 2016
Well sure, bringing in a Durant would impact what is done in free agency. We would lose Barnes and Ezeli for sure. However, I dont see how it would impact anything really. IF we brought in Durant, we would have a core of Curry, Thompson, Iggy, Durant, Draymond, Bogut, Livingston, and Looney. Thats 8 guys already. We would have to get reeeeally creative to fill out the bench, but its definitely possible. I cant imagine players like Ian Clark and James Michael MacAdoo would be hard to retain. Then we would likely have a rookie or 2 on the cheap.That doesn't answer what I asked..
I'm talking about possibly bringing in any of the names mentioned with you guys.. Retaining your own players shouldn't be an issue if your owner is willing to pay the luxury tax, but it's the timing of it with regard to free agency (which is what I was asking)