- Nov 15, 2007
- 7,904
- 2,187
I get why people are low on Ingram but the reason I think it's a good trade has more to do with my feelings on Murray's health and career longevity (I wouldn't have given him that extension at all imo).
I think environment matters and Denver would be the best situation Ingram has ever been in. He would help a lot defensively after they lost KCP, and plus he's a free agent after the year so he would be motivated to play well to get paid.
While he wasn't good in the playoffs last year, he was lights out the season before. He can be a super dynamic shotmaker and replace a lot of what Murray does while also giving you greater length (pause).
For New Orleans, the trade would split up Ingram/Zion, give them a real PG and more shooting etc.
Think it would work both ways even if Denver obviously would never do it because they're committed to Murray being part of their championship core.
I think environment matters and Denver would be the best situation Ingram has ever been in. He would help a lot defensively after they lost KCP, and plus he's a free agent after the year so he would be motivated to play well to get paid.
While he wasn't good in the playoffs last year, he was lights out the season before. He can be a super dynamic shotmaker and replace a lot of what Murray does while also giving you greater length (pause).
For New Orleans, the trade would split up Ingram/Zion, give them a real PG and more shooting etc.
Think it would work both ways even if Denver obviously would never do it because they're committed to Murray being part of their championship core.