The people who we routinely make fun of in here are now experts^^^ Hard for me to think of any “experts” less expert about the NBA than Nick Wright, Cowherd, Buecher and Broussard
. He knows he doesn’t even believe what he’s saying.
Ain’t no way the team that was 14 games better than the #2 seed in their conference, 7 games better than the #1 seed in the west, and the only 60+ game winners were ever the underdog at any pointSorry, y’all were underdogs because NikeTalk, Colin Cowherd and Nick Wright picked against you
Same energy for Tim Legler and Zach Lowe too?Sorry, y’all were underdogs because NikeTalk, Colin Cowherd and Nick Wright picked against you
Yes, gambling companies notoriously clean up on the average sports fan betting one way and the sharp money coming in is on the winnerSame energy for Tim Legler and Zach Lowe too?
The 89% of wagers on a betting site taking the Mavs? Seems like a lot. One might almost call that “most”. Guess folks just felt like being charitable.
This is probably made up too…
. Seriously, what are you trying to prove? You haven’t made one good point on this. Didn’t Lowe pick the Celtics at the beginning of the season too? I would just enjoy my team winning, not trying to make them the little engine that could. This is weird to me
All I said was most folks thought Dallas would win. And supported with some background info. Then you butted in about how I was wrong with nothing other than Celtics were the betting favorites, even though you do seem to understand how that could be the case while also not having most people backing them. You just don’t like the narrative. We get it.Yes, gambling companies notoriously clean up on the average sports fan betting one way and the sharp money coming in is on the winner
This doesn’t mean the mavericks were favorites. It means you could’ve won more money betting on the mavericks because they were +185 before the series started. Boston was -225. Boston was favored.Same energy for Tim Legler and Zach Lowe too?
The 89% of wagers on a betting site taking the Mavs? Seems like a lot. One might almost call that “most”. Guess folks just felt like being charitable.
This is probably made up too…
This is 100000% not true though. Thats the point.
The narrative is false. You’re lying. That’s the problem here.All I said was most folks thought Dallas would win. And supported with some background info. Then you butted in about how I was wrong with nothing other than Celtics were the betting favorites, even though you do seem to understand how that could be the case while also not having most people backing them. You just don’t like the narrative. We get it.
If anybody is being weird here it’s you sir
Enjoying my team winning quite well
Right, not saying that was the be all end all, which is why I also commented on folks who were just straight up picking them with no money on the line. There just wasn’t some sweeping idea that Boston was going to win.
Dallas was playing well heading into the finals but the more prevalent thought was “I wouldn’t be too surprised if Dallas won, but I think Boston takes it.” And they did, handily. They were not underdogs.
I don’t think Rudy was the answer but you understand why he wanted a 5.
Right. I interpreted all the picking against the Celtics in the Finals to be mainly wishful thinking and/or attempt to drive up interest in the series.
Ngl This isSorry, y’all were underdogs because NikeTalk, Colin Cowherd and Nick Wright picked against you
HIM
's fault
debate
Definitely makes the case for more people thinking the Celtics would win.
