- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,219
- 23,185
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I barely take my camera out now. Think I'm gonna start taking it with me to work and going on walks around my building and snapping some shots. Might be fun
YesIs this Hawk's Nest in Port Jervis, NY?
Word. I used to keep it on me. Smh.
Growing up is such a burden. Lol.
I don't think I've taken a photo since July - just not had the time and the days are so short here at this time of year that it's difficult.
Went out with the guy I often go out with at this time of year while we have a few days off - headed to this harbour with an interesting breakwater for dawn. A quick trip but got a couple of nice shots from it. I think this is the best one - about a 15 minute exposure with my 10 stop filter just as the sun was rising.
Picked up a 35mm f/2 and compared to my 50 f/1.8 and ehhh...
I like how much closee you can be and still frame well. The bokeh im like so and so about, the first time I used it I didnt like, the second time was better. It doesnt seem as sharp as my 50 though, and all reviews say it should easily be sharper (using both wide open apertures).
Dont know if I should return or keep it. Using it to compliment my 16-35 f/4, which I love and is super sharp.
I'll stick with the f/4 unless theres a reason he needs the 2.8 and if I had enough justification for the 2.8, i would only get the mk3. The f/4 is sharp and has IS. One of my favorite lens for sure.Bokeh becomes an issue with wide angle lenses. Your just not going to have the same creamy effect as a long lens unless you shoot close up to things but then sharpness can become an issue when you shoot open depending on the lens.
If you have the money, I would get the 16-35mm f/2.8 and just get rid of both other lenses. The new one is crazy expensive though.