Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
now if i had the 85 1.2 that'd be a bit of a different story
My 2 cents on the D500 vs. D750 subject:
well the difference is basically how much light the each is able to absorb, there are other things like a shallower depth of field, wider field of view(s), & maybe better noise performance/slightly cleaner images (genearally & at high iso especially) for full frame but if you can get more light onto a crop sensor, it can come pretty close to that 'full frame' look...each has their advantages, but those differences are really difficult to see for just about everyone
How did you guys find your "style" in photography?
How did you guys find your "style" in photography?
BothHow did you guys find your "style" in photography?
Like subject matter or post processing?
vignetting in real world usage of 1.8 isnt that bad man. also, if its that big of an issue, you can correct it in light room with a click of a checkbox
all are shot on either 85mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.8
nice. I love that spot
vignetting in real world usage of 1.8 isnt that bad man. also, if its that big of an issue, you can correct it in light room with a click of a checkbox
all are shot on either 85mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.8
Your portrait work is getting stronger bro, keep at it, I'm gonna say this as advice and I know you didn't ask for the criticism, but lose the watermark...lol using watermarks has become wild dated I cringe every time I see photographers watermarking their stuff...just my 2 cents
Focus on the Mark 3 is way better than the Mark 2. You will notice the difference if you are shooting concerts and sports as I did. It was worth getting the upgrade to the Mark 3 but I wish I just bought that off the bat.
One fr
now if i had the 85 1.2 that'd be a bit of a different story
Just watched a video on some 1.4 and 1.2 lenses those look insane.
My 2 cents on the D500 vs. D750 subject:
well the difference is basically how much light the each is able to absorb, there are other things like a shallower depth of field, wider field of view(s), & maybe better noise performance/slightly cleaner images (genearally & at high iso especially) for full frame but if you can get more light onto a crop sensor, it can come pretty close to that 'full frame' look...each has their advantages, but those differences are really difficult to see for just about everyone
That's what was making it tough for me. Looking at both statistics on paper it's was a close call, and even thought they are so similar since no-one has been able to test the comparison, it's hard to see how much alike they truly are.
I've never shot with FX before so I've never seen 1st hand how much it changes the way your images come out.
Better camera to start and learn with Canon T5 or Nikon D3300? Please help. Don't have much experience with any type of shooting
Don't overthink it. Both are fine cameras to start off with.
As said in her before, if you have a friend that shoots either Canon or Nikon you may want go with the same brand so you can borrow lenses.
Better camera to start and learn with Canon T5 or Nikon D3300? Please help. Don't have much experience with any type of shooting
If you want a rebel get the "i" version of the camera.
A used T4i is a good option. It'll run you maybe $300-$350 for the body only, then pick up a 50mm 1.8 for ~$100 or a 24mm 2.8 for a little more.
Whats the difference does the "i" make?If you want a rebel get the "i" version of the camera.
A used T4i is a good option. It'll run you maybe $300-$350 for the body only, then pick up a 50mm 1.8 for ~$100 or a 24mm 2.8 for a little more.
I currently develop and print my roll of films. Are you developing 35mm or medium format? IMO steel tanks never worked out for me, the plastic ones such as Pattersons are way easier to use.anybody developing film at home? i want to start doing that. i currently do it in class, but im in the photo 2 class and thats the last one so eventually i want to start doing it at home. what products do you reccomend?
basically i want a changing bag, film roll, tank and chemicals. any advice? i currently use the stainless steel tanks at schol, but im looking at the Patterson tanks currently.
I currently develop and print my roll of films. Are you developing 35mm or medium format? IMO steel tanks never worked out for me, the plastic ones such as Pattersons are way easier to use.
I need to scan and present my film stuff, got hundreds of photos not shown yet but I develop using HC-110. For 35mm & medium format I go with Kodak Tri-X 400 for both. I like how the blacks are more contrast. I use this site for all my development times. Whatever developer you use, it helps out alot. http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php