- 10,651
- 11,062
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
Bunch of authentics that I bought way too big during the jersey era
I look in my closet and SMH all the time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Bunch of authentics that I bought way too big during the jersey era
I look in my closet and SMH all the time
i would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a 300 dollar belt, but that's just my personal tasteWho's to say who gets to buy said items though? Is it because the guy was a young guy? No one would say anying if an adult 30-40 something year old would buy the same product. Is it wrong for someone to splurge on something every once in a while?
so if Mark Zuckerberg decides to spend $350 on a belt. Is it still foolish?
I have a $300 Gucci belt (I'm 19). What's wrong with it? It's far superior in quality and it feels good wearing it.
i would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a 300 dollar belt, but that's just my personal taste
like for me, nothing beats a simple black belt which you can get for $30. men wearing fancy belts has always seemed off to me
you can feel the belt through the pants?
I have a $300 Gucci belt (I'm 19). What's wrong with it? It's far superior in quality and it feels good wearing it.
It's my money so I can spend it on whatever I please.
i would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a 300 dollar belt, but that's just my personal taste
like for me, nothing beats a simple black belt which you can get for $30. men wearing fancy belts has always seemed off to me
Bunch of authentics that I bought way too big during the jersey era
I look in my closet and SMH all the time
I was ok with your post, until you said that. Actually, everything beats a pair of keds, you must not get out much. (no offense)I would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a pair of tennis shoes over $100, but that's just personal taste. Nothing beats a pair of black or white keds which you can get for $30. Men wearing fancy sneakers seem off to me.
I would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a pair of tennis shoes over $100, but that's just personal taste. Nothing beats a pair of black or white keds which you can get for $30. Men wearing fancy sneakers seem off to me.
I was ok with your post, until you said that. Actually, everything beats a pair of keds, you must not get out much. (no offense)I would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a pair of tennis shoes over $100, but that's just personal taste. Nothing beats a pair of black or white keds which you can get for $30. Men wearing fancy sneakers seem off to me.
i guess thats just the way it is then, i dont have a problem with you thinking that and can see why you would think it. like i have friends that spend money on something i think is a waste and ill let them know, just like people tell me that i spend too much money on video games. at the end of the day some people think one way and others think the other way, i dont expect you to think paying 100 for shoes is worth it. but seeing as this is a message board, why not discuss what we think is worth spending money on and what isnt? NT would be no fun if everyone agreed with each otherI would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a pair of tennis shoes over $100, but that's just personal taste. Nothing beats a pair of black or white keds which you can get for $30. Men wearing fancy sneakers seem off to me.i would laugh at anyone at any age that buys a 300 dollar belt, but that's just my personal taste
like for me, nothing beats a simple black belt which you can get for $30. men wearing fancy belts has always seemed off to me
woah woah keddle down, I said no offenseI don't get out much based on my preference in sneakers? You must hang out with some expensive taste losers (no offense)
Don't really wanna justify either of those but shoes are more essential than a belt as well as visible.Dudes clearly missed the sarcasm, I don't see how a $300 belt is unjustifiable but $150 kicks are
pretty much thismost everything i've bought over $100 has been foolish. never realized it until after my son was born.
Ed Hardy circa 2005
:x
Don't really wanna justify either of those but shoes are more essential than a belt as well as visible.Dudes clearly missed the sarcasm, I don't see how a $300 belt is unjustifiable but $150 kicks are