- 16,510
- 2,573
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Clattenburg NOT charged by FA, John Obi Mikel CHARGED for threatening Mark after the game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I don't see him reffing any Chelsea games in the future.
Is Falcao still planning on transferring to Chelsea in January?
I would not understand this...Falcao means no Torres, what good with that be?
Spending £69m on dismissing managers since 2004 says otherwise. They desperately need another striker because Torres isn't cutting it despite the goals he has scored so far. Sturridge can't play upfront on his own which makes their decision to loan out Lukaku even more bizarre.It would be an upgrade, yes.
I am simply saying why the hell would they buy him, they spent 50 million quid on Torres, Roman ain't about that losing money life.
It would be an upgrade, yes.
I am simply saying why the hell would they buy him, they spent 50 million quid on Torres, Roman ain't about that losing money life.
You're talking 69 million quid over EIGHT (8 ) managers...I'm talking about losing 50 million quid over ONE (1) player.
That shows how unstable and impatient he is with managers. What other team has spent that much money on managers? None. You think Chelsea will continue with Torres despite his lack of productivity? Nope, they are in the market for another striker and will sign Falcao if possible. Hell, they were even trying to bring back Drogba on loan but that deal is now off.You're talking 69 million quid over EIGHT (8 ) managers...I'm talking about losing 50 million quid over ONE (1) player.
im so tired of hearing what suits torres.. before he complained about the slower older midfielders and the need to bring in better ones.. the club does just that, and now they still don't suit him.. they play the same type of short game that spain does and torres had no problems with that before. He has lost it.. he should go..My question has been, how does Benetiz (Roman) plan on changing the play to suit Torres? It's been shown and proven that Oscar, Mata, and Hazard like quick 1-2 passes around defenders which doesn't suit Torres. What will they do? Change the way they play?
I think they kind of have to abandon Torres, sooner than later.
Indeed 50m quid is a lot to take a hit, but this isn't exactly United with debt looming over their heads, or Malaga with financial and tax constraints.
im so tired of hearing what suits torres.. before he complained about the slower older midfielders and the need to bring in better ones.. the club does just that, and now they still don't suit him.. they play the same type of short game that spain does and torres had no problems with that before. He has lost it.. he should go..My question has been, how does Benetiz (Roman) plan on changing the play to suit Torres? It's been shown and proven that Oscar, Mata, and Hazard like quick 1-2 passes around defenders which doesn't suit Torres. What will they do? Change the way they play?
I think they kind of have to abandon Torres, sooner than later.
Indeed 50m quid is a lot to take a hit, but this isn't exactly United with debt looming over their heads, or Malaga with financial and tax constraints.
Chelsea brought in Romelu Lukaku to replace Drogba, its time he was given the chance to do so. Bring him back from loan and let the dude play
Chelsea brought in Romelu Lukaku to replace Drogba, its time he was given the chance to do so. Bring him back from loan and let the dude play
People seem to forget that Lukaku is just 19. He's still a project and he needs at least the rest of this season and probably next season on loan as well before he'll be good enough to be Chelsea's top striker.
As far as i'm concerned, the Fernando Torres experiment is over and failed. But clearly Abramovich feels differently because he's essentially fired 3 managers now because none of them could get the most out of Torres. It's as if the whole club revolves around Fernando Torres and it's sickening.
Chelsea brought in Romelu Lukaku to replace Drogba, its time he was given the chance to do so. Bring him back from loan and let the dude play
People seem to forget that Lukaku is just 19. He's still a project and he needs at least the rest of this season and probably next season on loan as well before he'll be good enough to be Chelsea's top striker.
As far as i'm concerned, the Fernando Torres experiment is over and failed. But clearly Abramovich feels differently because he's essentially fired 3 managers now because none of them could get the most out of Torres. It's as if the whole club revolves around Fernando Torres and it's sickening.