darthska
Staff member
- Apr 30, 2004
- 46,958
- 31,563
Article is actually a good read too. She shouldn't of done that for this piece.
(I keed, I keeeed.)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article is actually a good read too. She shouldn't of done that for this piece.
Shirley, you don't honestly and truly think this is something new. 'Dewey defeats Truman' would like a word...Its a really sad and nasty trend happening across all of journalism now. Headlines of articles used to actually mean something or speak to heart of the piece. Now it’s just all about catching your eye yet people don’t even spare the time to read the content and gain something from it. It’s leading to the spread of misinformation and dismissal of valuable truth and knowledge.
I cannot answer this in good faith and with a clear conscious.
In their MVP year, who you got in these matchups?
What’d he say?Shaq got some damn nerve talking about the Bulls . I saw his Laker teams struggle against the Blazers , Kings and Pistons .
Shaq got some damn nerve talking about the Bulls . I saw his Laker teams struggle against the Blazers , Kings and Pistons .
What’d he say?
He was also property of the Jazz for a few years
@VARNELL HILL wavycrocket @pmainey pmatic
Now Justin Anderson and Josh Hart saying they would have averaged 40 in public school.
In other news
Shaq had the balls to say his Laker teams would handle the 96 Bulls
You could talk me into the 2001 Lakers beating the 1998 Bulls, who were on their last legs. Not the previous versions though.
It’s funny to see some of thes cats talking crazy now based off the success they had in college and making it to the pros...Some of these dudes wasn’t even like that in high school, nobody in MD was really worried bout Josh Hart back then
They never stopped what you talking aboutMJ / Bron debates already starting lol
The 01 Laker team was def peak form. It was before Shaq got too lazy by the third run and before too much of the mileage/toxicity mounted up. They were still hungry but also over their first year jitters. Kobe not only knew exactly what he was but his game matched
Fisher was entering his prime, Fox had a bounce back year, Shaw, Harp and Horry had some left
Horace Grant>Samaki and AC Green
The two other Laker squads idk, without remembering the Bulls teams that clearly I can't really have a conclusive take but even in that first title run, the Pacers gave them everything they could handle. That Indy home court was no joke. Then we all know about that Kings/Lakers series in their third title run (and yes SAC was good but so were those CHI teams lol)
Respectfully disagree but I see your argument clearly. They were hit square in the mouth in round 1, 3 and Finals and pulled through. All credit to them, it lends to my argument that the 01 team took all of that experience on top of Kobe's growing individual skill, on top of pre-lazy Shaq and propelled them to new heights. They almost didn't lose a single game the whole playoff run00 Lakers > 01 Lakers
IMO
I know the 01 lakers got hot towards the end of the year and then ran through the offs, but that 67 win laker squad was a juggernaut. Glen Rice, Kobe was all NBA on both sides, MVP shaq, Harper still had some left, Fox Horry were still hella viable, idk. 67 wins.
It was also the first basketball season that I actually tangibly remember growing up with
Respectfully disagree but I see your argument clearly. They were hit square in the mouth in round 1, 3 and Finals and pulled through. All credit to them, it lends to my argument that the 01 team took all of that experience on top of Kobe's growing individual skill, on top of pre-lazy Shaq and propelled them to new heights. They almost didn't lost a single game the whole playoff run
My point is if Chicago hit them square in the mouth like that in 00 idk if LAL is recovering
Regular season wins<only losing 1 game in a playoff run