- 2,649
- 512
Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773
- 3,276
- 3,062
No matter which candidate wins, the plans will still unfold
- 5
- 10
The funny things is that Romney will continue everything but the food distribution.Originally Posted by Pig Love
[h2]Top 7 Reasons to Re-Elect President Obama [/h2]
Among other things, Obama has legalized secret government arrests of U.S. citizens, legalized their torture and even their killing under his "kill list" rules, attacked farm freedoms and food freedoms, betrayed America on the issue of legalizing medical marijuana, and pursued the continued contruction and staffing of "refugee camps" which have now been shown to be "re-education FEMA camps."
At the same time, Obama has done nothing to protect the American people, protect the economic base of the nation or protecting the freedoms and liberties that give rise to economic abundance.
This would be funny if it wasn't true. Enjoy
- 14,244
- 5,474
and who exactly didn't see this coming?
@ everyone who believed in him and still has the bumper stickers on their cars
- 2,044
- 129
I'll throw this in the ring too:
[h1]Where is the outrage?
[/h1]
By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
For the past few weeks, I have been writing in this column about the government's use of drones and challenging their constitutionality on Fox News Channel where I work. I once asked on air what Thomas Jefferson would have done if -- had drones existed at the time -- King George III had sent drones to peer inside the bedroom windows of Monticello. I suspect that Jefferson and his household would have trained their muskets on the drones and taken them down. I offer this historical anachronism as a hypothetical only, not as one who is urging the use of violence against the government.
Nevertheless, what Jeffersonians are among us today? When drones take pictures of us on our private property and in our homes, and the government uses the photos as it wishes, what will we do about it? Jefferson understood that when the government assaults our privacy and dignity, it is the moral equivalent of violence against us. The folks who hear about this, who either laugh or groan, cannot find it humorous or boring that their every move will be monitored and photographed by the government.
Don't believe me that this is coming? The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the "recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function
[h1]Where is the outrage?
[/h1]
By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
For the past few weeks, I have been writing in this column about the government's use of drones and challenging their constitutionality on Fox News Channel where I work. I once asked on air what Thomas Jefferson would have done if -- had drones existed at the time -- King George III had sent drones to peer inside the bedroom windows of Monticello. I suspect that Jefferson and his household would have trained their muskets on the drones and taken them down. I offer this historical anachronism as a hypothetical only, not as one who is urging the use of violence against the government.
Nevertheless, what Jeffersonians are among us today? When drones take pictures of us on our private property and in our homes, and the government uses the photos as it wishes, what will we do about it? Jefferson understood that when the government assaults our privacy and dignity, it is the moral equivalent of violence against us. The folks who hear about this, who either laugh or groan, cannot find it humorous or boring that their every move will be monitored and photographed by the government.
Don't believe me that this is coming? The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the "recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function
pig love
Banned
- 2,124
- 123
Matt53 is my new profile
- 146,316
- 177,795
Originally Posted by OGbobbyjohnson773
