- 5,644
- 922
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
Minus well just ban people from being fat. Problem solved
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Minus well just ban people from being fat. Problem solved
I STILL DON'T GET HOW THIS IS RELEVANT?
IF THEY CAN'T BUY A 32 OZ, WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM JUST BUYING TWO 16 OZ.? OR JUST MORE OF THE SMALLER DRINKS IN GENERAL?
well da law was blocked because it was riddled with so many loopholes it was basically worthless on a moral standpoint.i have been preaching this from day 1. and the absolute sad part is that a lot of places offer unlimited refills, so this restriction wasn't making that much of an impact. the whole point was to send a message.I STILL DON'T GET HOW THIS IS RELEVANT?
IF THEY CAN'T BUY A 32 OZ, WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM JUST BUYING TWO 16 OZ.? OR JUST MORE OF THE SMALLER DRINKS IN GENERAL?
well da law was blocked because it was riddled with so many loopholes it was basically worthless on a moral standpoint.I STILL DON'T GET HOW THIS IS RELEVANT?
IF THEY CAN'T BUY A 32 OZ, WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM JUST BUYING TWO 16 OZ.? OR JUST MORE OF THE SMALLER DRINKS IN GENERAL?
i have been preaching this from day 1. and the absolute sad part is that a lot of places offer unlimited refills, so this restriction wasn't making that much of an impact. the whole point was to send a message.
freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>
thats da point, if da rule is pointless, why even institute it. and da mayor was caught over reaching, da majority of NYCers thought itfreedom >>> da hemi even?well da law was blocked because it was riddled with so many loopholes it was basically worthless on a moral standpoint.I STILL DON'T GET HOW THIS IS RELEVANT?
IF THEY CAN'T BUY A 32 OZ, WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM JUST BUYING TWO 16 OZ.? OR JUST MORE OF THE SMALLER DRINKS IN GENERAL?
i have been preaching this from day 1. and the absolute sad part is that a lot of places offer unlimited refills, so this restriction wasn't making that much of an impact. the whole point was to send a message.
freedom >>>>>>>>>>>>
i get loopholes. and idk about law to say that the mayor doesn't have the authority to put that kind of restriction in place. but it was simple enough to get around. buy two sodas (you wouldn't need to if you gettin refills anyways) and that was the point.
thats like buying a diet coke vs regular coke. its really not that much better. same thing. the act of buying 1 GIANT soda apparently isn't as bad as buying two smaller sodas. because 2 sodas in general sounds worse. either way the message is if you have to buy the big *** size or two, you are a fat ************.
thats like buying a diet coke vs regular coke. its really not that much better. same thing.
McD's is a company and can do as they wish. This is a law preventing the sales of large sodas in the city. Not comparableCount me as disappointed. McDonalds did the same thing when they stopped selling supersize fries, and not many complained. Gotta start somewhere with this obesity issue in the USA
McD's is a company and can do as they wish. This is a law preventing the sales of large sodas in the city. Not comparable
Then why don't we just outlaw soda all together? No one needs to drink soda, period. There is no nutritional value. I think the same thing about drug legalization. Once you start telling people what to do with THEIR OWN BODY, you've crossed a major line.Who cares? It's a good thing. Stop the ridiculous portions. No one needs or should have a soda that big.McD's is a company and can do as they wish. This is a law preventing the sales of large sodas in the city. Not comparable
isnt that kind of the point?I STILL DON'T GET HOW THIS IS RELEVANT?
IF THEY CAN'T BUY A 32 OZ, WHAT'S STOPPING THEM FROM JUST BUYING TWO 16 OZ.? OR JUST MORE OF THE SMALLER DRINKS IN GENERAL?