- 13,656
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
Originally Posted by soychulo
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Would have been interesting if Bush wasn't playing. Not saying OU would have won. Auburn should have been in that game anyway.
Can anybody give a legitimate reason why "Auburn should have been in that game anyway"? 'Cause your talking out your *@@ at this moment. Isn't there a sell thread you got to go approve.
I thought that Bush was more of a decoy in that BCS title game; Leinart/Steve Smith/Jarrett and the defense were the true beasts. With him or without him, give Norm Chow almost a month to prepare, no one was beating USC (on the field) that year, either Auburn or OU.
Bush was kind of a non-factor that game. Leinart came out torching the OU secondary.
Let's not let facts get in the way, let the haters continue to hate.