- 3,009
- 421
Saw this Friday afternoon.
Thumbs down.
Unfortunately, the film played out as I had expected it would. Oh well...
Thumbs down.
Unfortunately, the film played out as I had expected it would. Oh well...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by roback1991
This film sucked.
Yes, I read the graphic novel.
That is true, Snyder tried his best to convert the words right out of the comic but Laurie/ SSII was just horrible I think. She needed to cuss outmore too.Originally Posted by Falcon4567
In regards to a point that RFX made about the acting too "theatrical" I think its partly because dialogue was lifted directly from the book (and remember even Moore didn't write superheroes like "normal" people until later on in his career) and partly because Snyder wanted to make a comment about comic book adaptations.
[h2]'Tales of the Black Freighter' DVD Details![/h2]
by Elisabeth Rappe Jan 30th 2009 // 5:10PM
Tales of the Black Freighter was always my favorite part of Watchmen and as much as I'm looking forward to the film, it's the DVD spin-off that keeps me awake at night. We've got details on the animated DVD -- which unfortunately hits shelves on March 24 instead of before or on Watchmen's release date of March 6.
Tales of the Black Freighter is a comic book within the graphic novel, a gruesome pirate story that has very little to do with pirates, and everything to do with what's going on in Watchmen itself. It follows the lone survivor of an attack by the dreaded Black Freighter, and his desperate journey to get back home before the Freighter attacks his town. It's a nice little journey into madness, depravity, and horror as the sailor realizes what the ultimate goal of the Freighter is. Good stuff. I only wish it could have been done live action -- but at least they snagged Gerard Butler to voice the main character. The adaptation runs 30 minutes -- and oddly is carrying a PG-13 rating (Blu-Ray is currently Unrated) despite previous reports that it would be R.
Also on the DVD is the Hollis Mason tell-all, Under the Hood. A combination of CG and live action, it sees all the necessary Watchmen actors reprising their roles to tell the history of the first costumed adventurers, the Minutemen. DVD extras on both regular and Blu-Ray include a first look at The Green Lantern (it's not specified whether it's the much hoped for live-action version, or a preview of the animated film), and Story Within A Story: The Books of Watchmen. The Blu-Ray version also includes a digital copy of the film.
At some point, this will be incorporated into an ultimate DVD release of Watchmen and be interspersed through the film the way it is through the book. But can you really wait that long to watch it? Check out larger images of art below.
Well that's part of why i don't pay any attention to user reviews. The people in here that say "it sucked", those werebasically their only words. They didn't expand on that or give solid reasons. Useless.Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
I don't see how you can say it SUCKED....it wasn't great but it didn't suck there were a lot of enjoyable parts....I could do without the hallelujah music during the sex even though its supposed to be portrayed as awkward.
Movie itself was solid, very close to the actual novel and visually done well, but the movie doesn't have that IT factor that the book had. The novel was very political and so far in depth, its as if it flew over the directors head and just made a flick word for word.
Originally Posted by Dr Spaceman
Well that's part of why i don't pay any attention to user reviews. The people in here that say "it sucked", those were basically their only words. They didn't expand on that or give solid reasons. Useless.Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
I don't see how you can say it SUCKED....it wasn't great but it didn't suck there were a lot of enjoyable parts....I could do without the hallelujah music during the sex even though its supposed to be portrayed as awkward.
Movie itself was solid, very close to the actual novel and visually done well, but the movie doesn't have that IT factor that the book had. The novel was very political and so far in depth, its as if it flew over the directors head and just made a flick word for word.
Falcon4567 wrote:
I'll Netflix it and decide whether or not I'd want to purchase it.� Here's the thing: Alan Moore gets not a dime from any of these adaptations he's waived his rights and all the money goes to the artist.
And RFX stop acting like we never get along you make it sound like we're Angel and Spike:
Fair enough.
I was waiting for Moore's name to appear in the motion comic and ... nothing.
Really sucks for Moore though, the man is a genius and I can understand why he did what he did.
I wonder is he has or will see the movie though? I mean if my greatest work were to become a movie, even if I hated it's creation, I would be so tempted towatch it anyways.
Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
I don't understand what the big deal was over the blue penis, I expected it to be something horrible the way people were talking about it.
Homophobia.Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
I don't understand what the big deal was over the blue penis, I expected it to be something horrible the way people were talking about it.
Originally Posted by 18key
like he was striking down Vietcong with his 50 ft. *$!#.
Originally Posted by kix4kix
Score was amazing.