vlad is no where near the player pujols is,sorry.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Just like when they signed Vlad back in the day....how'd that work out?Originally Posted by tim teufel
damn pujols won,angels will be a problem good lord
vlad is no where near the player pujols is,sorry.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Just like when they signed Vlad back in the day....how'd that work out?Originally Posted by tim teufel
damn pujols won,angels will be a problem good lord
Originally Posted by tim teufel
vlad is no where near the player pujols is,sorry.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Just like when they signed Vlad back in the day....how'd that work out?Originally Posted by tim teufel
damn pujols won,angels will be a problem good lord
Originally Posted by tim teufel
vlad is no where near the player pujols is,sorry.Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Just like when they signed Vlad back in the day....how'd that work out?Originally Posted by tim teufel
damn pujols won,angels will be a problem good lord
Naija Nitemare:
Also with regard to that Vlad comment
Werent we like 2 games from the WS in 2005? The AJ Pierzynsky fiasco with the whole strikeout but didnt tag him out nonsense?
We were quite good back in those days.
Yep. Drove me insane.To this day, I can't stand AJ because of that.
Still, though, didn't win it all. And when we did, it was with a roster of a bunch of guys who were hungry to get known, not a bunch of guys who were already known. I mean, I'm definitely more happy with these two apparent signings then ANY of the signings we've had since 2002, so… we'll just have to see what happens.
Naija Nitemare:
Also with regard to that Vlad comment
Werent we like 2 games from the WS in 2005? The AJ Pierzynsky fiasco with the whole strikeout but didnt tag him out nonsense?
We were quite good back in those days.
Yep. Drove me insane.To this day, I can't stand AJ because of that.
Still, though, didn't win it all. And when we did, it was with a roster of a bunch of guys who were hungry to get known, not a bunch of guys who were already known. I mean, I'm definitely more happy with these two apparent signings then ANY of the signings we've had since 2002, so… we'll just have to see what happens.
Thank you. I had to bring this one back so that we can see the who the real fans are since that bandwagon is about get fullOriginally Posted by 23ska909red02
Hmmmmm, I'll just let this serve as the off-season thread as well, even though it was made in July.No point in having two Angel threads for the apparent Pujols/Wilson signings, and this thread was made by an Angels fan, so we'll let it ride.
Definitely going to see all kinds of folks coming out the woodwork now, just like 2003.
And I've said this before about the Angels, and this recent news doesn't change my stance: I liked that we won it all in 2002 with the roster of veritable no names. But since then, we've signed a bunch of big names, and I don't feel that has produced a championship roster… …
… …yet.
But apparently picking up a top pitcher in the game and a top hitter in the game… we'll just have to see.
Thank you. I had to bring this one back so that we can see the who the real fans are since that bandwagon is about get fullOriginally Posted by 23ska909red02
Hmmmmm, I'll just let this serve as the off-season thread as well, even though it was made in July.No point in having two Angel threads for the apparent Pujols/Wilson signings, and this thread was made by an Angels fan, so we'll let it ride.
Definitely going to see all kinds of folks coming out the woodwork now, just like 2003.
And I've said this before about the Angels, and this recent news doesn't change my stance: I liked that we won it all in 2002 with the roster of veritable no names. But since then, we've signed a bunch of big names, and I don't feel that has produced a championship roster… …
… …yet.
But apparently picking up a top pitcher in the game and a top hitter in the game… we'll just have to see.
