- Apr 5, 2008
- 39,589
- 80,201
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Y’all start up a KFC thread for all that talk..we ain’t trying hear that bs in here this strictly Popeyes territory
I finally tried this bull****. This sandwich wasn’t worth the hype:
Bruh it was a piece of boneless Popeye's in between 2 buns. They hype was even about the sandwich. They hype was for the attention.yall must have some wack locations lol
cuz in its prime that sandwich was the truth
Round 1 was really really good. It's still good, just not as big as it used to be,
Yes. You ever heard of the Mandela Effect? The mind is an amazing thing, man.You think multiple mfs just saying this **** for no reason?
"I never had it but I'm 1000% sure you guys are wrong."
I can't stand mf'ers like that. You have no ****ing idea what you're talking about. Just sit down. Print this **** out on paper.
Business Insider had tried the first sandwich, and called it "a true revelation." But when they saw people tweeting that their sandwiches had seemed smaller than the original, they had to investigate. And even though Popeyes has been mum on the whole thing, they noticed a discrepancy — the original sandwich was a whopping 690 calories, while the relaunched sandwich was, according to menu boards, 660 calories.
Whaaaaat?
Read More: https://www.mashed.com/174005/the-dark-truth-behind-the-return-of-popeyes-chicken-sandwich/
Lol show the rest of the article.
Some have said the second sandwich — while still good — just doesn't hold together like the original. The pickles were different (maybe?) and there was less mayo. Maybe. Popeyes did confirm that nothing had changed, so what's the deal? Are rushed and overworked employees finally hitting exhaustion levels? Is it a variation in stores? Popeyes isn't saying.
Because there was no change to the recipe.
You found A change. Good for you, but you do realize the calories can change without effecting taste. The cut of the chicken change the calories. Im talking about the TASTE. Maybe I should've been more clear. We do need anyone running their blood pressure up.
Correct, the chicken changed. It's not as big. That means the sandwich changed. As I said earlier, it's still good. I don't taste a huge difference. It's just not as huge as it once was.Lol show the rest of the article.
Some have said the second sandwich — while still good — just doesn't hold together like the original. The pickles were different (maybe?) and there was less mayo. Maybe. Popeyes did confirm that nothing had changed, so what's the deal? Are rushed and overworked employees finally hitting exhaustion levels? Is it a variation in stores? Popeyes isn't saying.
Because there was no change to the recipe.
You found A change. Good for you, but you do realize the calories can change without effecting taste. The cut of the chicken change the calories. Im talking about the TASTE. Maybe I should've been more clear. We do need anyone running their blood pressure up.