- 36,507
- 38,492
You dudes are still feeding the troll.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not the time man. I could see if what I am saying could even remotely be taken as trolling. Doing stuff like this removes the integrity of the conversation. Cut it out manYou dudes are still feeding the troll.
Don't do it man it's not worth it, dude is a jobber man he's not worth it. I repeat he's not worth it.This Dolph slander gotta stop. For real.
Y'all gon make me join Peep
Just because something is great for a time period doesn't mean it ISN'T hurting the product long term
Right, they are trying to recreate it for the reason that it was the biggest financial and most popular era in the last 25 years.It was solid entertainment, and set the bar too far IMO. They try to recreate it ofr a reason.
But that doesn't mean it was what was best for the business LONG TERM. That is my argument.
What are the problems with them trying to implement those practices today
1. PG-Era: No matter what they do, Linda is going to be lurking in the political ranks, so the company's "raunch" has to die down. So they couldn't do those wild things even if they wanted to.
2. There is no competition: WCW punishing them in the ratings is what put that spark in WWE's approach. No need for 3 hours. No need for Star vs Star in EVERY match. No need for long drawn out promos IN the ring, a ring should only be used for a fight.
So them chasing what they did back then is the MAIN reason why I said that time period has hurt the business long term
Don't do it man it's not worth it, dude is a jobber man he's not worth it. I repeat he's not worth it.
He's not killing the 70's. So I don't care.Dc killing these marks childhood with truth
Dc killing these marks childhood with truth
marks
marks
My name is Mike tho... Not Mark...
My name is Mike tho... Not Mark...
Stop trying to be my bff.My name is Mike tho... Not Mark...
marks
My name is Mike tho... Not Mark...
Mike Gorman?
alexander Bagwellmarks
alexander Bagwell