- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,035
- 16,945
Heel means nothing. He is a heel but he gets OVER with the fans very much so because of his ability in the ring AND on the mic. And the fact that he was ballsy enough to take things to a new level and cross some lines, especially with his promos. That ability to be "controversial" hasn't been around since Stone Cold left.OK but isn't Punk the "heel" ? Aren't people supposed to win if they are a face? Or at least the fans supposed to be happy about that?
What aspect are you all judging this from? Just to be against the grain? Or is there a legitimate reason of why the rock should have lost?
I don't read much into storylines etc so I really want to understand.
I've always liked Punk because he kept it real. Wasn't fake or anything. What you saw is what you get. And his in ring ability is unmatched by anyone in the WWE (except for Daniel Bryan).
Watch this promo and you will understand why people love him so much. Then proceed to watch his match against Cena at MITB. Watch how nuts the crowd goes even though Punk was the heel.