- 36,618
- 11,306
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
��
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Mez 0ne
Its ridiculous how "advanced" we portray ourselves as a country yet half the country doesn't have medical insurance. If you currently are covered your current plan will not be affected.
...and these same republicans are complaining about a 3 cent soda tax to go towards a government health care system (if it is even applied), which would raise billions and billions of dollars alone. Bush signed an 800M prescription drug plan a few years ago and the government still doesn't know where the money is coming from to this day.
So much selfishness.
...but you've got enough excess income to invest into shoes?Originally Posted by Dathbgboy
U right ppl, gotta know better but they won't b/c its easier to complain and walk blindly than it is to inflict change some how. Everyone should have health care period. And not some bul**** HMO. There are ppl dyin b/c they don't have insurance and the dumb hospitals aren't reasonin w/ em financially.
The way I see it, the Republicans only want *%** that's gon benefit their social class even tho they have lower class members, the Dems try to make *%** universal for everyone but got a +%*%!! up way about doin it, which in the end makes it seem stupid.
Healthcare should be mandatory, plain and simple. I aint been to the doctors in 3+ yrs til last month b/c I aint have insurance and couldn't afford out of pocket. Politicians are so out of touch w/ the majority
Originally Posted by SUSHI AND GRITS
How u gonna just judge dude like that![]()
Heath.Care.Needs.To.Be.Free. Why do people need to buy health? That's ridiculous on all levels. Give me one reason.
For the same reasons why "medicine" treat but don't cure. The world has been run on money for centuries. It will continue to do so but certain things have NOTHING to do with money.
The implications of government monopolized healthcare could give you just that. Once the taxpayers pay for someone else's health, it won'tbe too difficult to regulate more aspects of our daily lives to justify the cost of 'healthcare savings'.Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
You need to ask yourself "who are these people who usually eat crap food?". It's usually poor people who can not afford freshfruits, vegetables and other healthy foods.Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
Compassion ?Originally Posted by SUSHI AND GRITS
This isn't about affording healthcare, though. I don't see anyone in here *****ing about not affording. It's deeper than that. Compassion is something everyone doesn't have.
Stop with the fear mongering. To the second separated statement not one of those are true and is not even a possibility.Originally Posted by duerr
The implications of government monopolized healthcare could give you just that. Once the taxpayers pay for someone else's health, it won't be too difficult to regulate more aspects of our daily lives to justify the cost of 'healthcare savings'.Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
I'm honestly amazed that the tinfoil crowd isn't all over this one. Do you really want someone else regulating what you can eat (for your own good), what you can wear (for your own good), how much exercise you have to have every week (for your own good), etc.
I don't know if it would happen, but the possibilities are pretty creepy.
Well, in all fairness, Heart Disease is the #1 killer of Americans. Obesity is a contributing factor in the development of heart disease, so...Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
You joking dude, I hope you joking. Eating healthy is like being religious, nobody really knows if it helps, but it sure doesn't hurt.
You realize how many illnesses are not related to what we eat?
Fear mongering ? I clearly said that "I don't know if it will happen, but the implications are pretty creepy". The implications AREcreepy. If you want to ignore that, fine.Originally Posted by Essential1
Stop with the fear mongering. To the second separated statement not one of those are true and is not even a possibility.Originally Posted by duerr
The implications of government monopolized healthcare could give you just that. Once the taxpayers pay for someone else's health, it won't be too difficult to regulate more aspects of our daily lives to justify the cost of 'healthcare savings'.Originally Posted by apassionforshoes23
^If people would stop eating CRAP then maybe we wouldn't need doctors. Food minus chemicals=Utopia
I'm honestly amazed that the tinfoil crowd isn't all over this one. Do you really want someone else regulating what you can eat (for your own good), what you can wear (for your own good), how much exercise you have to have every week (for your own good), etc.
I don't know if it would happen, but the possibilities are pretty creepy.
To the first statement we wouldn't need government to step in if private insurance did not screw up the system. So the only reason that private insurance can't compete IS because they are inefficient. Your comeback: You can't compete with government they have endless supply of money. My response: What do you say if I told you in other markets there is competition between gov't and private sector? USPS, UPS & Fedex. Private insurance dug their hole now the free market is going to correct it. If they can't compete it is because they offer insufficient goods at a awful price. 5 million have been dropped since Sept 08 from private insurance. Since 1999 health care costs have gone up 119%..
Who wants to do the same thing we did in 1993 and kill a health care bill and see if it turns out different? raise your hand, if that is you.
Also you complain about Medicare, Medicade, and the VA.. Like Rep. Weiner of NY said take it away try to vote to abolish it see where it gets you.. I will find the video in a sec.
Fear mongering ? I clearly said that "I don't know if it will happen, but the implications are pretty creepy". The implications ARE creepy. If you want to ignore that, fine.
How are they creepy? Do all the other nations with nationalized health care programs automatically become these red communist countries like all these crazyright wingers tell us we'll become? i don't see it.
If you want to talk about "creepy", look at things like homeland security and the patriot act - those are much closer to putting us in trouble thanproviding basic health care to every man, woman, and child in the most advanced country in the world. We look like idiots not taking care of our citizensbecause we don't want to have to help pay for one another, when in reality we're all paying extra for the current broken system anyways.
Originally Posted by Essential1
Take a few minutes and read this.
Here's my take on it. They were elected to represent the people. And this current situation with the health care bill is the same with everything else. A big part of the reason why the financial crisis happened (they were paid to look the other way). Health Care (they are paid to kill the bill).. Employment (they are paid to kill any employee benefits bill). I will tell you where this came from. Politics has always been corrupt but in the modern times, Milton Friedman (the fraud of a economist) started the Greed is good movement and conservatives and business followed. When Greed and Capitalism are two completely different things and should be held as far apart away from each other. You know what happens when people become too greedy they get caught or they fail.
Milton Friedman (the fraud of a economist)
![]()
![]()
![]()
i first thought when he bolded it that it was like something he was posting that somebody else wrote, then i saw he just thought what he wrote was reallyimportant... then i saw this line, too.![]()
Originally Posted by Craftsy21
Fear mongering ? I clearly said that "I don't know if it will happen, but the implications are pretty creepy". The implications ARE creepy. If you want to ignore that, fine.