Search results

Bought mines like 5 years ago DS for 575 here on NT. XI's are still DS, wish I had never worn the VI. Way better then These XI's nowadays.

I think they are ok, but not sure what they look like in hand.

I think it depends on how icey they are, the more icey the more some people Like me are willing to pay.

If it seems to good to be true. then it probably is.

Legit, Nice kixs I just dont like that the 23 on the heels of the CDP XI's peel off.

a little beat up but legit.

I would say about 150 tops. Thats just my opinion.

They are fake. The lettering on the tounge is wrong. The 2001 retro says something else not exactly sure but I know it's different from the shoes pictured.

It say 7/8/09 on one side and it says 2/12/10 on the right side. I own a pair and both dates are before release date.

So do you just assume they are B-grades or is there some identificationon the shoe saying they are? On the other hand these have a production date after release date.

What makes a shoe a B-grade? Or is it term we throw out there cause we don't know if a shoe is authentic or not? Why do theseshoes have a production date of February 2010 and the werereleased in December of 2009?

Yeah better pics would help btw where's the lazer etched tissue paper?

Yeah better pics would help btw where's the lazer etched tissue paper?

A little used but still legit.

A little used but still legit.

I won some like that on EBay for $320 about a month ago. Actually the ones I won were in better condition.

I won some like that on EBay for $320 about a month ago. Actually the ones I won were in better condition.

I'd say anywhere from 350-400 in your average size. The bigger sizes might be a little more.

I'd say anywhere from 350-400 in your average size. The bigger sizes might be a little more.

They're Legit. It seems theses newer Jordans seem to yellow more faster then the first retros in my opinion.