- 3,405
- 120
Billups wants to stick it to the Knicks.
His obvious choice would have to be the Heat.
I don't like it.
His obvious choice would have to be the Heat.
I don't like it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Nope, wasn't being sarcastic at all.
Definitely appreciated you detailing that further, because like I said, you definitely painted an entirely different picture of those two lists.
Originally Posted by soychulo
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Nope, wasn't being sarcastic at all.
Definitely appreciated you detailing that further, because like I said, you definitely painted an entirely different picture of those two lists.
Another factor I've added in every time I see the deals offered is the likely success of the team next year. What NO would have gotten in the Laker offer may have kept them somewhat competitive but not a great team. This would have put them lower in the draft next year possibly out of the lottery.
With the Clipper's offer they would just plain be terrible and be guaranteed another high pick in the lottery next year. For me the team is more valuable after a bad year next year and two high draft picks, plus Kaman off the books and two players still on rookie contracts in Bledsoe and Aminu. Why I've always felt the Laker's offer was not in the best interest of NO. It would make them a mediocre team with older guys basically putting them several years out from what they could accomplish in just one more year. Namely, rebuilding with tons of cap room and young talent on cheap contracts.
Originally Posted by gaseousfashion
Billups wants to stick it to the Knicks.
His obvious choice would have to be the Heat.
I don't like it.
They have a rich owner. He even said that he'll spend whatever it takes to keep dwight, how true that is, I don't know. What I do know is that, DeVos is loaded and has always been willing to spend money.Originally Posted by Buc Em
The problem is.....the Magic have no cap room and zero tradeable assets. So it's literally impossible for them to improve their team in the foreseeable future.
Sources: Hornets GM Dell Demps a "spectator" in basketball decisions. Stern's deputies running Chris Paul talks.
I hope Demps does resign.
http://t.co/aCKoI8Ua
That's what I've been saying. If I'm otis smith, and I'm given the green light by the owner to spend whatever it takes, in order to keep dwight, CP3 and Deron Williams would be in training camp right now(maybe not both, but you get my point). Smith really took a BIG risk last year, acquiring both Hedo's and Gil's contract, and it backfired. I hope that dwight stays, and we get CP3 or Dwill this year, or next year in free agency.Originally Posted by TroyMcClure
Just watched some Dwight interviews. I am praying that he is too big of a softy to leave ORL. Lemme get in the front office for 48 hours and I will build a championship team.
See: Kemp, ShawnOriginally Posted by OHyeah10
Whats up with everyone shedding weight over the summer? I know curry had to and he is still relatively chubby.
Originally Posted by Seymore CAKE
Originally Posted by soychulo
Originally Posted by 23ska909red02
Nope, wasn't being sarcastic at all.
Definitely appreciated you detailing that further, because like I said, you definitely painted an entirely different picture of those two lists.
Another factor I've added in every time I see the deals offered is the likely success of the team next year. What NO would have gotten in the Laker offer may have kept them somewhat competitive but not a great team. This would have put them lower in the draft next year possibly out of the lottery.
With the Clipper's offer they would just plain be terrible and be guaranteed another high pick in the lottery next year. For me the team is more valuable after a bad year next year and two high draft picks, plus Kaman off the books and two players still on rookie contracts in Bledsoe and Aminu. Why I've always felt the Laker's offer was not in the best interest of NO. It would make them a mediocre team with older guys basically putting them several years out from what they could accomplish in just one more year. Namely, rebuilding with tons of cap room and young talent on cheap contracts.
Which is why I said they weren't going to get any better offers than this. You bottom out while getting a draft pick that will be high, an expiring and two young pieces, one of which played pretty well last season. You're guranteed 2 lottery picks and money off your books. Makes perfect sense to me.
While thereâs been no official transition of power, general manager Dell Demps has been completely pushed to the side in deal-making decisions for the Hornets, multiple league sources told Y! Sports.
âHeâs basically a spectator now,â
Originally Posted by ill steelo
While thereâs been no official transition of power, general manager Dell Demps has been completely pushed to the side in deal-making decisions for the Hornets, multiple league sources told Y! Sports.
âHeâs basically a spectator now,â
He's definitely no longer at that elite level he was a couple seasons ago, but I think he could still be a serviceable starting PG in the right situation.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
People think Billups is still good?