⭐ OFFICIAL 2020-2021 NBA Off-Season Thread: Olympics begin 7/23; NBA Draft 7/29⭐

Status
Not open for further replies.


02EF6A43-6E9F-4468-965D-0EFDAF1D05E7.gif
 
Still up in the air about Chauncey


The Claim
Billups and others brought the victim to Walker's house after they went to a comedy club. On the drive to Walker's house and especially once there, Billups and others raped the victim orally, vaginally, and anally.

Where There Is Agreement
First, both victim and Billups agree they met at the comedy club.

Second, they also agree that Billups orally penetrated the victim while in the car.

Where They Disagree
First, Billups claims the sex was consensual. The victim obviously does not. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim immediately called a friend. This means there is a contemporaneous record supporting her claim. And remember, this is a woman who had been in the NBA sphere for awhile (she dated Walker for months). For her to call a friend immediately after waking up and make this claim is very telling.
  • The rape kit is clearly suggestive of rape. From the police report: rape kit examination revealed injuries to he throat, cervix, and rectum, along with bruising on her back consistent with someone being dragged across a rug. Semen had been retrieved from her vagina.
Second, Billups and one of his co-defendants also deny that they ever went to Walker's house at all. Instead, they claim she went to Billups' house with the victim and performed the "consensual" acts there. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim woke up early the next morning at Walker's home with another co-defendant. Billups has no explanation for how she ended up there. So, if he's to be believed, a woman without a car and with no cell phone left his house after having sex with multiple men, somehow ended up at Walker's very, very late at night, only to be raped by someone else.
  • Walker never denies that Billups was at his house or that the rape occurred there. In her lawsuit against him, a District Court judge ruled that it wasn’t clear Walker knew the woman was being assaulted and that he had no obligation under state law to stop the attack. This would explain why Billups didn't want to place himself at the home. He was afraid there was enough proof that rape occurred there.
  • After the attack, Walker sued Billups. While the records of this suit were never revealed, I view this as suspicious and suggestive of him believing the victim (his ex girlfriend) and being upset with Billups.
TL;DR
  • Billups admits to sexual contact, but claims it was consensual.
  • Afterward, the victim immediately called a friend and told her she'd been raped.
  • There was also a rape kit that clearly suggested rape had occurred.
  • Billups distances himself from the rape by claiming he never went to Walker's house. This is highly unlikely. The logistics of his story are almost impossible, and a sealed suit from Walker against Billups suggest he's lying.
 
charles barkley can retire now. He’s never been right on his predictions, his commentary about the game is dated, and hes always on the verge of crossing the line with his right wing beliefs.

plus he always ***** up and go silent with that goofy *** smile when shaq bullies him on the show.

when he retires fox news will probably hire him as an on air talent
 
getback said:
Still up in the air about Chauncey


The Claim
Billups and others brought the victim to Walker's house after they went to a comedy club. On the drive to Walker's house and especially once there, Billups and others raped the victim orally, vaginally, and anally.

Where There Is Agreement
First, both victim and Billups agree they met at the comedy club.

Second, they also agree that Billups orally penetrated the victim while in the car.

Where They Disagree
First, Billups claims the sex was consensual. The victim obviously does not. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim immediately called a friend. This means there is a contemporaneous record supporting her claim. And remember, this is a woman who had been in the NBA sphere for awhile (she dated Walker for months). For her to call a friend immediately after waking up and make this claim is very telling.
  • The rape kit is clearly suggestive of rape. From the police report: rape kit examination revealed injuries to he throat, cervix, and rectum, along with bruising on her back consistent with someone being dragged across a rug. Semen had been retrieved from her vagina.
Second, Billups and one of his co-defendants also deny that they ever went to Walker's house at all. Instead, they claim she went to Billups' house with the victim and performed the "consensual" acts there. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim woke up early the next morning at Walker's home with another co-defendant. Billups has no explanation for how she ended up there. So, if he's to be believed, a woman without a car and with no cell phone left his house after having sex with multiple men, somehow ended up at Walker's very, very late at night, only to be raped by someone else.
  • Walker never denies that Billups was at his house or that the rape occurred there. In her lawsuit against him, a District Court judge ruled that it wasn’t clear Walker knew the woman was being assaulted and that he had no obligation under state law to stop the attack. This would explain why Billups didn't want to place himself at the home. He was afraid there was enough proof that rape occurred there.
  • After the attack, Walker sued Billups. While the records of this suit were never revealed, I view this as suspicious and suggestive of him believing the victim (his ex girlfriend) and being upset with Billups.
TL;DR
  • Billups admits to sexual contact, but claims it was consensual.
  • Afterward, the victim immediately called a friend and told her she'd been raped.
  • There was also a rape kit that clearly suggested rape had occurred.
  • Billups distances himself from the rape by claiming he never went to Walker's house. This is highly unlikely. The logistics of his story are almost impossible, and a sealed suit from Walker against Billups suggest he's lying.
Click to expand...
wow had no idea this hsppened

billuos is disgusting
 
Out of all the close games this yr, Zion only got a play drawn up to get the ball the last possession maybe twice. BI would get the ball the majority of the other times.

There was even one game where BI and Zion was both in the game but SVG drew up the last play for Eric Bledsoe instead. Still dunno what that decision is about.

The next coach should make Zion the priority, for sure.

Next priority should also be to focus more on the younger guys. I don't think he was doing that enough. I understand playing the vets like Eric Bledsoe and Adams if pels was winning, but they weren't. At some point SVG should've shifted his focus to playing the younger guys.
 
Last edited:
getback said:
Still up in the air about Chauncey


The Claim
Billups and others brought the victim to Walker's house after they went to a comedy club. On the drive to Walker's house and especially once there, Billups and others raped the victim orally, vaginally, and anally.

Where There Is Agreement
First, both victim and Billups agree they met at the comedy club.

Second, they also agree that Billups orally penetrated the victim while in the car.

Where They Disagree
First, Billups claims the sex was consensual. The victim obviously does not. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim immediately called a friend. This means there is a contemporaneous record supporting her claim. And remember, this is a woman who had been in the NBA sphere for awhile (she dated Walker for months). For her to call a friend immediately after waking up and make this claim is very telling.
  • The rape kit is clearly suggestive of rape. From the police report: rape kit examination revealed injuries to he throat, cervix, and rectum, along with bruising on her back consistent with someone being dragged across a rug. Semen had been retrieved from her vagina.
Second, Billups and one of his co-defendants also deny that they ever went to Walker's house at all. Instead, they claim she went to Billups' house with the victim and performed the "consensual" acts there. Who to believe? Consider:

  • The victim woke up early the next morning at Walker's home with another co-defendant. Billups has no explanation for how she ended up there. So, if he's to be believed, a woman without a car and with no cell phone left his house after having sex with multiple men, somehow ended up at Walker's very, very late at night, only to be raped by someone else.
  • Walker never denies that Billups was at his house or that the rape occurred there. In her lawsuit against him, a District Court judge ruled that it wasn’t clear Walker knew the woman was being assaulted and that he had no obligation under state law to stop the attack. This would explain why Billups didn't want to place himself at the home. He was afraid there was enough proof that rape occurred there.
  • After the attack, Walker sued Billups. While the records of this suit were never revealed, I view this as suspicious and suggestive of him believing the victim (his ex girlfriend) and being upset with Billups.
TL;DR
  • Billups admits to sexual contact, but claims it was consensual.
  • Afterward, the victim immediately called a friend and told her she'd been raped.
  • There was also a rape kit that clearly suggested rape had occurred.
  • Billups distances himself from the rape by claiming he never went to Walker's house. This is highly unlikely. The logistics of his story are almost impossible, and a sealed suit from Walker against Billups suggest he's lying.
Click to expand...


Never heard of this.

Damn Chauncey.
 
I do remember that story. I also remember a similar situation involving Chris Webber and Juwan Howard since that was a big deal locally. That's what led to C-Webb getting sent to Sacramento.

I don't understand why that would stop Billups from getting a job tho. Isn't Jason Kidd a hot name currently? :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest News

View All News

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom