- 61,817
- 133,937
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As a pels fan, yep! This team severely underperformed this year and the players didn't seem to respond to him.Did SVG deserve to be let go?
GIVE THE JOB TO AUNTIE T-SPOON
Better than recycling the same old set of coaches.
Giver her a shot.
Becky Hammond too.
when has that ever changed?James looks fat and slow
wow had no idea this hsppenedStill up in the air about Chauncey
The Claim
Billups and others brought the victim to Walker's house after they went to a comedy club. On the drive to Walker's house and especially once there, Billups and others raped the victim orally, vaginally, and anally.
Where There Is Agreement
First, both victim and Billups agree they met at the comedy club.
Second, they also agree that Billups orally penetrated the victim while in the car.
Where They Disagree
First, Billups claims the sex was consensual. The victim obviously does not. Who to believe? Consider:
Second, Billups and one of his co-defendants also deny that they ever went to Walker's house at all. Instead, they claim she went to Billups' house with the victim and performed the "consensual" acts there. Who to believe? Consider:
- The victim immediately called a friend. This means there is a contemporaneous record supporting her claim. And remember, this is a woman who had been in the NBA sphere for awhile (she dated Walker for months). For her to call a friend immediately after waking up and make this claim is very telling.
- The rape kit is clearly suggestive of rape. From the police report: rape kit examination revealed injuries to he throat, cervix, and rectum, along with bruising on her back consistent with someone being dragged across a rug. Semen had been retrieved from her vagina.
TL;DR
- The victim woke up early the next morning at Walker's home with another co-defendant. Billups has no explanation for how she ended up there. So, if he's to be believed, a woman without a car and with no cell phone left his house after having sex with multiple men, somehow ended up at Walker's very, very late at night, only to be raped by someone else.
- Walker never denies that Billups was at his house or that the rape occurred there. In her lawsuit against him, a District Court judge ruled that it wasn’t clear Walker knew the woman was being assaulted and that he had no obligation under state law to stop the attack. This would explain why Billups didn't want to place himself at the home. He was afraid there was enough proof that rape occurred there.
- After the attack, Walker sued Billups. While the records of this suit were never revealed, I view this as suspicious and suggestive of him believing the victim (his ex girlfriend) and being upset with Billups.
- Billups admits to sexual contact, but claims it was consensual.
- Afterward, the victim immediately called a friend and told her she'd been raped.
- There was also a rape kit that clearly suggested rape had occurred.
- Billups distances himself from the rape by claiming he never went to Walker's house. This is highly unlikely. The logistics of his story are almost impossible, and a sealed suit from Walker against Billups suggest he's lying.
Still up in the air about Chauncey
The Claim
Billups and others brought the victim to Walker's house after they went to a comedy club. On the drive to Walker's house and especially once there, Billups and others raped the victim orally, vaginally, and anally.
Where There Is Agreement
First, both victim and Billups agree they met at the comedy club.
Second, they also agree that Billups orally penetrated the victim while in the car.
Where They Disagree
First, Billups claims the sex was consensual. The victim obviously does not. Who to believe? Consider:
Second, Billups and one of his co-defendants also deny that they ever went to Walker's house at all. Instead, they claim she went to Billups' house with the victim and performed the "consensual" acts there. Who to believe? Consider:
- The victim immediately called a friend. This means there is a contemporaneous record supporting her claim. And remember, this is a woman who had been in the NBA sphere for awhile (she dated Walker for months). For her to call a friend immediately after waking up and make this claim is very telling.
- The rape kit is clearly suggestive of rape. From the police report: rape kit examination revealed injuries to he throat, cervix, and rectum, along with bruising on her back consistent with someone being dragged across a rug. Semen had been retrieved from her vagina.
TL;DR
- The victim woke up early the next morning at Walker's home with another co-defendant. Billups has no explanation for how she ended up there. So, if he's to be believed, a woman without a car and with no cell phone left his house after having sex with multiple men, somehow ended up at Walker's very, very late at night, only to be raped by someone else.
- Walker never denies that Billups was at his house or that the rape occurred there. In her lawsuit against him, a District Court judge ruled that it wasn’t clear Walker knew the woman was being assaulted and that he had no obligation under state law to stop the attack. This would explain why Billups didn't want to place himself at the home. He was afraid there was enough proof that rape occurred there.
- After the attack, Walker sued Billups. While the records of this suit were never revealed, I view this as suspicious and suggestive of him believing the victim (his ex girlfriend) and being upset with Billups.
- Billups admits to sexual contact, but claims it was consensual.
- Afterward, the victim immediately called a friend and told her she'd been raped.
- There was also a rape kit that clearly suggested rape had occurred.
- Billups distances himself from the rape by claiming he never went to Walker's house. This is highly unlikely. The logistics of his story are almost impossible, and a sealed suit from Walker against Billups suggest he's lying.
That article was true, Bob won