&Originally Posted by Al3xis
Originally Posted by Scott Frost
Agreed.
Many of them are probably too young to remember the Nebraska team which is why it's hard to debate theseteams. I do believe that the Huskers overall are better.
Exactly.
What are you trying to say here?
Originally Posted by dreClark
What are you trying to say here?
Originally Posted by itsaboutthattime
Originally Posted by dreClark
What are you trying to say here?
that some players are a by-product of the good players around them..
it's the alvin harper corollary.. sure he was good when he was with the cowboys and michael irving was drawing the attention of the defense, but as soon as he went to another team we found out how 'good' he really was
While at the University of Miami, Dorsey was known as a consummate winner, leading the Hurricanes to the 2001 national championship and posting a record of 38-2 as the team's starting quarterback. Dorsey also effectively rewrote the school record book, setting career records for total offense (9,486 yards), passing yards (9,565), passing touchdowns (86), pass completions (66, pass attempts (1,153), victories as a starting quarterback (3
In addition, was named the co-MVP of the 2002 Rose Bowl (in which Miami defeated the University of Nebraska to win its fifth national championship), Offensive Player of the Year twice (2001, 2002), and first-team All-Big East three times (2000, 2001, 2002). Dorsey was also a finalist for the Heisman Trophy in both 2001 and 2002 and the winner of the 2001 Maxwell Award, which is given to the national collegiate player of the year.
He was a weakness? Come on man...every QB for the most part who plays for a Miami, FSU, UF, USC, Ohio State, etc...has a stacked team., obviouslynot to that extent but still.
You name your top 5 QB's and I can present the same argument you have against Dorsey against them...
So, you're insinuating that Weinke was good only because of the players around him?Originally Posted by dreClark
What are you trying to say here?
Originally Posted by CP1708
at people just throwing out random "Miami homers" like they even know anything about Nebraska.
my point is.. that in relation to the rest of that team, he was the weak point
and the team was not the same because they lost ALOT of talented dudes.. and then some of the guys that came in never worked out
and the reason i compared him to trent dilfer is because at no point was he asked to go out and win a game.. all that team needed was for him not to mess things up
all i can remember thinking while watching that team is what would it have been like if they had a dude who would actually end being a starting QB in the NFL
You're just alking out of your #%@. If you didn't pay attention during Dorsey's years don't try to comment like you did or you know whatyou're talking about.
I mean....this stuff you're saying wouldn't make sense even to you if you had even bothered to look at his friggin wikipedia page. Cmon now.
Son called Ken Dorsey a game manager.You're right.....he never was asked to go win a game. But he never had to. By your logic Matt Leinart was nevera great college QB either. And he didn't have many comeback drives either....because the games were usually blowouts. But to say that made him less of aplayer is pure stupidity.
FTR....he has been a starting QB in the NFL. Just not a successful one. But neither have a lot of #1 picks at QB either.......so again.......what's yourpoint?
Originally Posted by Chester McFloppy
Originally Posted by CP1708
at people just throwing out random "Miami homers" like they even know anything about Nebraska.
at Miami homers not knowing anything but Miami football.
