- 9
- 10
Last edited:
1999 bred 4's need a L/C. The tag seems off to me because there is no date on it.
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by jpdc55,
- Start date
- 520
- 94
They didn't have dates back then they had code like yours says 990103 that means it's either January 3,1999 or March 1, 1999. They look legit to me.
- 9
- 10
Are the letters and stitching off in the back?
- 520
- 94
They look good to me just worn and beat
- 88
- 27
I think JB added the production dates some time later.
- 13,597
- 26,331
- 520
- 94
I knew it was something like that lol. I just couldn't remember the order. So there you have it OP is was 01/03/99
- 42,891
- 43,456
The date is on there. 990103
- 9
- 10
So 100% legit right?
- 2,928
- 1,311
The pair pictured are legit
They had two different layouts for the tags back then, some had the date above the size chart (like the pair posted) ...some had the date under the barcode:
They had two different layouts for the tags back then, some had the date above the size chart (like the pair posted) ...some had the date under the barcode:
- 13,597
- 26,331
- 2,928
- 1,311
Yeah my bad, I should have clarified the date under the barcode is the label print date.
So used to looking for that one when doing LCs ...above the size chart is the manufacture date of the actual shoe, but it is unnecessary to look for when doing LCs.
So used to looking for that one when doing LCs ...above the size chart is the manufacture date of the actual shoe, but it is unnecessary to look for when doing LCs.
Last edited:
- 9
- 10
Does the tongue kinda look too high?
- 10,288
- 3,826
Na man these look good.. I wouldnt wear them though.. they could start to have issues or something if they havent been worn in some time..
