2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 - WOW giant evo
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by ridingonlorenzos,
- Start date
- 2,785
- 202
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
No 2doors?
- 2,785
- 202
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
No 2doors?
- 7,918
- 6,300
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2005
After thinking about it, the numbers on the new 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 is 475HP / 475 torque with 0-60 in 4.5sec, making
the new Charger SRT8 10 and 10 less.
My wife and girls would look great in it with me so it's still on the radar.
the new Charger SRT8 10 and 10 less.
My wife and girls would look great in it with me so it's still on the radar.
- 7,918
- 6,300
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2005
After thinking about it, the numbers on the new 2011 Challenger SRT8 392 is 475HP / 475 torque with 0-60 in 4.5sec, making
the new Charger SRT8 10 and 10 less.
My wife and girls would look great in it with me so it's still on the radar.
the new Charger SRT8 10 and 10 less.
My wife and girls would look great in it with me so it's still on the radar.
- 552
- 169
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2003
...And the Evo X front takes heavy styling cues from Audi.Originally Posted by finnns2003
at the front bumper. Blatant.
Its all relative.
- 552
- 169
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2003
...And the Evo X front takes heavy styling cues from Audi.Originally Posted by finnns2003
at the front bumper. Blatant.
Its all relative.
- 4,522
- 298
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2004
Im on the fence about the redesigned back, besides that I like the new look.
- 4,522
- 298
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2004
Im on the fence about the redesigned back, besides that I like the new look.
- 12,981
- 5,243
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
UGLY.
- 12,981
- 5,243
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
UGLY.
- 1,496
- 758
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
not a fan
- 1,496
- 758
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
not a fan
- 2,255
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
I'd put 26" Forgiatos or Asantis on it, @%%% what a purist says.
- 2,255
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
I'd put 26" Forgiatos or Asantis on it, @%%% what a purist says.
- 3,827
- 31
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- 3,827
- 31
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- 6,358
- 4,094
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
It has nice elements but they are not cohesive at all. The back looks like it belongs to another car.
- 6,358
- 4,094
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
It has nice elements but they are not cohesive at all. The back looks like it belongs to another car.
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
doesn't flow at all
it looks they cut up pictures of 3 cars and pasted them together, the back end looks
it looks they cut up pictures of 3 cars and pasted them together, the back end looks
- 68,176
- 24,538
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2008
doesn't flow at all
it looks they cut up pictures of 3 cars and pasted them together, the back end looks
it looks they cut up pictures of 3 cars and pasted them together, the back end looks
- 10,933
- 4,861
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
QFMFT.
FAIL ON DODGE'S PART.
WEIGHT TO POWER RATIO WILL BE ATROCIOUS. WOULD GLADY GRAB THE NEW CAMARO SS OR NEW MUSTANG COBRA OVER THIS. HELL, I'LL TAKE THE NEW MUSTANG 5.0 GT OVER THIS.
EDIT: 5 SPEED?
- 10,933
- 4,861
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
QFMFT.
FAIL ON DODGE'S PART.
WEIGHT TO POWER RATIO WILL BE ATROCIOUS. WOULD GLADY GRAB THE NEW CAMARO SS OR NEW MUSTANG COBRA OVER THIS. HELL, I'LL TAKE THE NEW MUSTANG 5.0 GT OVER THIS.
EDIT: 5 SPEED?
- 2,577
- 475
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
why they gotta copy the evo tho
- 2,577
- 475
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
why they gotta copy the evo tho