There seems to be this stigma with the Saints and Pats that their backfields are worthless.
I'd urge NTers to not buy into that perception as it's absolutely untrue.
Said it before, and I'll say it again...
Pats, 4th amongsts all teams in rushing TDs. Ran the ball more than 15 other NFL teams. That's not even including passes thrown to their RBs.....Looking for that stat.
(team RB passing targets).
Saints, 6th in rushing yards, 8th in rushing TDs, and that's not even considering the times Sproles was targeted in the pass-game.....
So as you can see, RBs play an integral role in both offenses. People seem to lump the Pats, Saints and Packers in one neat pile. The Pats/Saints =/= Packers.
The only backfield I can confidently look past for fantasy purposes is the Packers (though I'd take a long hard look at Alex Green in PPR formats). To write off the Saints and Pats would be foolish (ESPECIALLY in PPR formats). However even in 12-team standard leagues, a guy like Ridley or Ingram can be a strong flex option as they'll both be getting the rock near the goal-line. I also love Ingram this season where his ADP is, great value and is being overlooked by a lot of people. Full training-camp, healthy now, I like his chances of possibly having a break-out season.
.