3
38816
Guest
What does that have to do with his stats? His scoring went from 16 even to 15.9. FG% improved. 3P% went from .348 to .361 and 2P% went from .475 to .491.
A 16 PPG scorer with 3 assist and 4 rebounds PER isn't considered a good NBA player? He's not the guy you want leading your team (the issue in Orlando) but still a good player.
yet, yall criticize russell for not deferring to him?
makes sense.
If the Cavs disappeared off the face of the Earth and OKC was considered an Eastern conference team, Thunder would be a top 4 east seen and they would make the finals ala 2001 Sixers and 2007 Cavs, and get promptly destroyed by real competition.
i agree.
which is kind of my entire point.
i was talking to a dude earlier about harden vs westbrook for MVP
he goes "russ didn't win. he got put out"
i'm like "but what if hou wins the chip? whats the difference if you faced them in the 1st round or the finals?"
dude said "its a big difference"
how?
i was never under any impression that OKC would beat anyone in any series......they shouldn't have even made the playoffs.
they made the playoffs ONLY because of westbrooks style of play, which, supposedly, isn't a winning style of play.
unless he gets actual professional basketball players, we may never know.
(i want to see blake go to OKC SO BAD now....)
Last edited by a moderator: