dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,913
- 20,772
That pic was posted in here ages ago lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We already passed the early pic stage. They’re all inconsistent with materials and infrared shade.Where’s Air Randy when you need him for da early pics?
Heh, fitting comment when considering your screen name.Where’s Air Randy when you need him for da early pics?
We already passed the early pic stage. They’re all inconsistent with materials and infrared shade.
We already passed the early pic stage. They’re all inconsistent with materials and infrared shade.
I quoted you to say that because you said the heel panel portion doesn’t look good?
And I was explaining that despite you thinking that, it’s an OG feature and there’s plenty of people who want a true OG retro.
No idea why you quoted me to tell me your age as if it has anything to do with you wanting OG features or not.
Er, in fact it absolutely has something to do with me wanting OG features.
You seem to have misread my post in terms of the point I was making ... in the sense that YEAH, I understand why people want a true OG retro. I'm one of them. I owned two pairs of them in 1990. I never said the "anodized" ankle panel doesn't look good on the OG or that I don't want it, I said it doesn't necessarily look good if they were to implement it with the current idiotic molded ankle bump--an ankle bump which is a long damn way from how the OGs are. Aquamanjay_ 's post illustrated that, which is what we were talking about. And what I said is, you can't have the true OG look if they anodize the ankle but keep that ankle shape the way it is. Often with these retros, getting an OG-accurate look isn't as simple as one detail. That is what I said originally.
It's all good, man. Sometimes things aren't clear or get lost in interpretation when reading posts on a forum. Pretty sure we're on the same page.
In a somewhat unrelated matter, I really want the Carmine’s to get another release. These need a NA and the remaster treatment so I can sell my CDPs lol.
OG in the sense that it was a PE that MJ wore in the playoffs when he came back. So in a sense, yea they are.
You missed out by not getting those IMO. Those were a really good retro. If 2019 Black/Infrared are at least as good as those I’ll be happy.
I think i get your point on og details.Er, in fact it absolutely has something to do with me wanting OG features.
You seem to have misread my post in terms of the point I was making ... in the sense that YEAH, I understand why people want a true OG retro. I'm one of them. I owned two pairs of them in 1990. I never said the "anodized" ankle panel doesn't look good on the OG or that I don't want it, I said it doesn't necessarily look good if they were to implement it with the current idiotic molded ankle bump--an ankle bump which is a long damn way from how the OGs are. Aquamanjay_ 's post illustrated that, which is what we were talking about. And what I said is, you can't have the true OG look if they anodize the ankle but keep that ankle shape the way it is. Often with these retros, getting an OG-accurate look isn't as simple as one detail. That is what I said originally.
It's all good, man. Sometimes things aren't clear or get lost in interpretation when reading posts on a forum. Pretty sure we're on the same page.
I think i get your point on og details.
It’s like seeing the 2011 concord with the same low patent leather and reverse jumpman, but the 23 is stitched and the patent leather has white edges. It’d be weird seeing og details on a completely different mold. Kinda like getting every 92 color on the 2011 Bordeaux 7 right, but keeping that weird 2011 shape/mold. Right?
They are in fact THE OG, the pair they released the following season is the retro