- Dec 27, 2012
- 8,643
- 11,714
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So true on this. The high tongue with the holes in it set them apart from everything else at that time. It was crazy. Thats what we were talking about when we were kids. The J with the high tongue that had the holes, not the materials used.Nike can do the materials perfectly, and even get the shape right, but sadly, they still won't get the tongue height correct! It's going to be too short and won't look like the OGs (the entire holes in the tongue were above the collar height of the shoes back in '91, as seen in the Mars/Genie poster above). The high tongue was the big thing when these released back in. '91! The tongue with the holes stood out and made the shoe so so different! Loved my pairs when I was in 8th and 9th grade.
Nothin wrong with that. Its all opinion at this point. Nike got all wanting different things because they have changed so much stuff up over the years. So I get it.I honestly prefer the shorter tongue.
Nike can do the materials perfectly, and even get the shape right, but sadly, they still won't get the tongue height correct! It's going to be too short and won't look like the OGs (the entire holes in the tongue were above the collar height of the shoes back in '91, as seen in the Mars/Genie poster above). The high tongue was the big thing when these released back in. '91! The tongue with the holes stood out and made the shoe so so different! Loved my pairs when I was in 8th and 9th grade.
I want the soft neoprene from the original Spzizikes. Those at least allowed the tongue to stretch.
I understand the high tongue is og, but in regard the height it’s been (2000-present), I can’t say I have a problem with the current tongue. Being a little higher would be fine, but I’m not sure if I’d like it as high as MJ’s pairs.
It is strange that JBs official NDC photos have og height tongues, but none of the actual pairs did. They stay doing that McDonald’s ad vs real burger type stuff
1. If thats them.. no leathered heel and possible boot toe
2. Probably UA's
3. WTF kind of weak *** preview is that supposed to be
I understand the high tongue is og, but in regard the height it’s been (2000-present), I can’t say I have a problem with the current tongue. Being a little higher would be fine, but I’m not sure if I’d like it as high as MJ’s pairs.
It is strange that JBs official NDC photos have og height tongues, but none of the actual pairs did. They stay doing that McDonald’s ad vs real burger type stuff
Nope. To my knowledge and eyes, pretty much every shoe in the Nike.com official photos is a sample. These tend to have different features than the retail pairThat's because the first photo shows the tongue pulled up while the second photo is how they come out the box. The tongue is the same and it's not original 1991 height.
Nope. To my knowledge and eyes, pretty much every shoe in the Nike.com official photos is a sample. These tend to have different features than the retail pair
That's because the first photo shows the tongue pulled up while the second photo is how they come out the box. The tongue is the same and it's not original 1991 height.
Neither my white or Black Infrared could reach that height, even with pulling. Neither could my brother’s Carmine. Those are samples. That pair is not being pulled by some invisible hand. Pretty much every promo sample has features that are better than the retail pairs. 3s tend to have perfect shape, some 6s have the high tongue, 7s have perfect shape not on any retail pair, same goes for 13s. almost all visible jordan size tags on the Nike.com pics have sample tagsI have to disagree here. The tongue on the 6 with the lace pocket didn’t move up or down that much. That lace pocket is engaged in both photos along with the lace lock. There isn’t enough slack to allow that tongue with engaged lace pouch snapped to the tongue to sag down that much in the side photo. You can even see the top of the pouch where the snap is in that side photo. That height has to be a difference of at least an inch and a quarter to an inch and a half. That clearly is a different tongue.
I understand the high tongue is og, but in regard the height it’s been (2000-present), I can’t say I have a problem with the current tongue. Being a little higher would be fine, but I’m not sure if I’d like it as high as MJ’s pairs.
It is strange that JBs official NDC photos have og height tongues, but none of the actual pairs did. They stay doing that McDonald’s ad vs real burger type stuff