- 8,799
- 10,386
What's that got to do with anything? Was a random carjacking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's that got to do with anything? Was a random carjacking.
I mean it's a plus. But you know what I mean. The contrast heel, improved infrared shade, nice durabuck and so on.What's that - a sole and some laces..
I mean it's a plus. But you know what I mean. The contrast heel, improved infrared shade, nice durabuck and so on.
Easily the best Infrareds ever beside the ogs. I cant believe they actually put the contrast heel on there. Granted it is less pronounced than the 91 or even 2000, but can’t ask for much more. The infrared shade is spot on, and the 3m isn’t overdone like on the 2014. Durabuck with white lining to make them pop. Shape and toe box looks great. I just wish it had the high og tongue.
These are a solid 9.5/10. You are legally insane if you pass these up, unless you just don’t like the 6 at all.
This comment is ****** up. How the hell is this relevant to anything here. Quit watching utube B's.The same Jordan that got his daddy killed??
I’m insane, then. Passing. And I had them in ‘91. Just don’t do anything for me anymore. I’d rather have a nice retro of the white/infra pair or even the carmines. Tastes change. I just generally don’t dig all black shoes to wear anymore, and I don’t need these sitting in my closet just to have them anymore. Upcoming IVs are an exception. Nice to see they surprisingly seem to have done these pretty well, though.
Im not a fan of the high tongue so these are perfect to me. Top to bottom.
Now lets see if these have a rock hard sole like the 2000. All thats left to call these the best retro outright is the wear test. Its looking like a landslide victory though
The same Jordan that got his daddy killed??
look at it
Maybe to YOU it's barely noticeable, but the contrast is clear as day and does make a noticeable difference in the look of the upper on these.They used the pair I posted a while back to create these. I said (predicted) that it was going to be barely noticeable.
Maybe to YOU it's barely noticeable, but the contrast is clear as day and does make a noticeable difference in the look of the upper on these.
It’s crazy I’m saying this, but can we stop the arguing over the details and how someone describes them? It’s like every day now sheesh.
Thought I’d contribute somehow.
The contrast on my DMP’s is very slight at first glance but the way they wear differently are evident. Heel vs mid through the toe.
One of the best 6s EVERThought I’d contribute somehow.
I'm lookin at that ****** glue job
look at it
I don't want to annoy people in the thread by going back and forth beating a dead horse into an unrecognizable mess, so the last thing I'll say is that I get you and I agree. I assumed you meant barely noticeable in general. Obviously from far away and in bad lighting it won't be a big difference. Anyways I'm just glad they did these well and added the dang heel in the first place. Looking forward to seeing more photos of these!Well given the lighting in the photo of course you're going to see it but on feet it will be barely noticeable. Barely noticeable: a slight difference. Photo tonytobacco posted on the previous page:
It’s crazy I’m saying this, but can we stop the arguing over the details and how someone describes them? It’s like every day now sheesh.
One of the best 6s EVER
I’ve seen them thrice in person. One kid in my high school around 2009. The next two were at my college; two Alpha Phi Alpha guys had them. Ultimate grail. Rare to actually see on foot tooStrong agree famb.
My DMP’s aren’t wearable anymore but they’re my grails so I’m keeping them as long as possible.